@Ereiam
Since when did “a day and-a-half-late” count as being out of touch or not in tune with everything else that’s going on?
Until now, I have never heard anyone in this thread complain or disparagingly remark with such incredulous dismissal that someone who had no idea that (apparently) being a single 24-and-half hours behind the “news cycle” of this thread is somehow committing the politically-centric topical equivalent of unironically reviving a dead meme, less than two months after it lost its popularity and its initial heyday of topical relevance, by bringing up the aformentioned political topic less than two days after its very first day of gaining notable publicity, and it really seems like the only reason why you’re responding in this manner is because you have nothing else to say that is critical of my post that can counteract it in an a process of execution that can, alone, convince others that you’re somehow more favorable of having your stance be taken seriously, all for the sake of being contrarian to rational assessments of certain topics (like mine of the admittedly-insipid-as-can-be M&M one, that you replied to) that happen to not fall in line with your overly-rigidly-concived ideological worldview.
I will give you this, though: the arguments and the philosophical rationale behind what is clearly your carefully-assessed and considered rebuttals that you’re using to dismiss and downplay actual, legitimate points and principles made by others that you don’t automatically, necessarily agree with have gotten notably more imaginative, this time around: I certainly didn’t expect you have this particular trump card of convenient dissmissal up your sleeve.