Posts

@Chibi dragon lord  

 
There’s many, many screencaps that show ponies making suggesting looks at the camera. Some are even deliberate by the show itself.
 
From Feather Bangs and his boys’ song and dance numbers, to Coloratura and even the Dazzlings from Equestria Girls, there was rather a lot of sex appeal (oh, completely forgot about Rarity’s music video showing cleavage).
 
This is a pony with a completely featureless butt looking over her shoulder. Any lewdness, I would say, is completely yours to add. If you don’t want to see bedroom eyes, simply block that tag.

@DR35  
Clit outline? All I see is normal cameltoe, which is usually Questionable.

@DR35  
Prominent low-detail genital, anus, or nipple outlines in clothing
 
Low detail (this is literally just a pencil line) cameltoe is only suggestive. I fail to see anything here that would be explicit.

Should this be changed from questionable to explicit? Because there is an outline of the clit even though she’s dressed in spandex.  
>>2175340t (deleted)

@Chibi dragon lord  
To ponder this further a moment:  
And the female gender exists evolutionarily to reproduce, yet we tag such as Safe; we can quite safely just ignore the reasons for things existing and focus on what actually is going on in the image.

@LightningBolt  
Okay, just wondering.

@Chibi dragon lord  
Safe.

Should this be tagged as safe or suggestive? Because although there isn’t anything sexual going on in it, it’s confirmed to be a sex doll of rainbow dash.  

@DR35  
Questionable. Explicit for nudity is only when you can actually see the genitals and such. It’d even be Suggestive if there weren’t part of the nipples showing.

@DR35  
Ahhh it’s time to clean up “strategically covered” again.

>>2174362t (deleted)  
Should it be still questionable or explicit? as the feather tips of the dancer is commin’ in close to revealing the nudity.

@Princess Luna  
Okay good to know. Next time if I see a similar picture (one that doesn’t break Rule #3 that is), I’ll tag it as that.

@Damaged  
And of course the more specific content tags relevant to that (semi-)grimdarkness.

@mjangelvortex  
Generally Semi-grimdark.

@mjangelvortex  
Well, moot now, though it would be good to know for future how such are tagged.

@mjangelvortex  
Done. Added a few tags to it in the meantime. Still unsure what rating it should have (that’s always one of my weakpoints).
 
Edit: On the other hoof, grimdark specifically calls out PTSD events as being its purview, and there’s plenty around with that this will trigger.

@Damaged  
Feel free to do so. I was honestly thinking the same but wasn’t sure on whether to report it or not.

@mjangelvortex  
Toss up between:  
Semi-grimdark — Imminent fatal violence, like a gun pressed to the head
 
Grimdark — Horrific sights
 
Honestly speaking, though, I was about to report it for “obligatory pony”.

Should a picture containing a real life event where people died be tagged as Safe?
 
>>2172463p (deleted)
 
I wouldn’t tag this as safe.

@radpanic  
Yes.

 
This should be questionable rather than explicit, right? She’s still wearing panties, and her belly’s so huge it’s obscuring her groin, so you couldn’t see anything even if she were completely naked.

@Princess Luna  
Fair point. I’ll leave it as is then.

@mjangelvortex  
Personally, as should be clear by me having rated that Safe, I don’t think just panties with no context or anything should be Suggestive; it makes no sense given the clearly-Safe EqG swimwear that is just as skimpy and also is Safe without extra context.

I noticed there’s a pack called Pantiepalooza and it’s basically characters in their parents. Some of them are tagged as Safe (including this closeup shot of some panties) but I think that maybe they (or at the very least this specific one) should be tagged as Suggestive. What do you guys think?