Rainboom Dash 
Rainbooms4Ever
@BlackCat
it’s auto added to 15.ai but yeah talknet and so-vits-svc also need it
it’s auto added to 15.ai but yeah talknet and so-vits-svc also need it
AI Content Help- Ask questions, discuss, comment, complain
Poll results: Do you think the current policy is where it needs to be?
The current policy is where it needs to be
40.51% 64 votes
The current policy did not go far enough
29.11% 46 votes
The current policy has gone too far
25.32% 40 votes
Something else? (Mention it below)
5.06% 8 votes
Poll ended with 158 votes.
🂾𝕃𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕟𝔹𝕣𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝔽𝕒𝕟🂽 
Goodbye guys ;)
Is Bézier curve an AI? If it is, I’m AI artist then, because I can’t imagine myself drawing without using MS Paint’s curve tool.
I use that tool in Inkscape all the time :D
Jewellier 
*Gigachad theme plays*
Since this thread if for general AI discussion,
I’ve recently watched a video about a man who uses AI as his art medium where he explains his process from start to finish. His vision stays consistent throughout, and he persists with multiple models, inpainting tools, and his own photoshop skills to create a good piece. One picture takes him over 15 hours to finish.
I’ve recently watched a video about a man who uses AI as his art medium where he explains his process from start to finish. His vision stays consistent throughout, and he persists with multiple models, inpainting tools, and his own photoshop skills to create a good piece. One picture takes him over 15 hours to finish.
I wanted to share this to reinforce that AI-generated stuff can, indeed, be art, if it’s curated by a human. It also takes a lot of time and effort to produce. I know that low-effort images are annoying, but I feel such a pity when I see people despise AI in all its forms.
Rainboom Dash
Rainbooms4Ever
@Jewellier
definitely a difference between AI generated and AI assisted
definitely a difference between AI generated and AI assisted
And in that case it would be AI assisted
I like both stuff but I do find a lot of AI generated stuff is generic due to the same basic prompts multiple people use
Ciaran 
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
I wanted to share this to reinforce that AI-generated stuff can, indeed, be art, if it’s curated by a human.
Thank you for sharing your perspective on the topic. I agree
ai generated works can be very appealing and impressive, and know that people who get those good results are putting a lot of time and energy into their results. But I think it is important to note that where this site is concerned, we do not treat ai generated works as art.As @The Frowning Pony mentioned though, this would definitely be
ai assisted, which does get treated as art here.
The Frowning Pony
Administrator
13 blinks per minute
@Jewellier
@Rainboom Dash
For the purposes of this site, that would definitely fall under “ai assisted”. Here, “ai generated” is meant to be used for images that are almost entirely the result of a prompt with very little iteration or external editing.
@Rainboom Dash
For the purposes of this site, that would definitely fall under “ai assisted”. Here, “ai generated” is meant to be used for images that are almost entirely the result of a prompt with very little iteration or external editing.
But yes, what the video shows is definitely human art, and not very different at all than how many artists, including revered concept artists, have created their work for years; just substituting “other people’s photos and art” with “things prompted from AI”.
Now just wait until people hear about how most concept art (the stuff people drool over on artstation or cgsociety) are overpaints…
-Craft- 
Now just wait until people hear about how most concept art (the stuff people drool over on artstation or cgsociety) are overpaints…
There’s an interesting GDC video of a concept art studios art director going over some of the ways things have changed and the various ‘cheats’ used today, It’s actually quite fascinating and I’ve used some of their cheats myself. The whole idea of using the 3d google earth map to just nail a cityscape scene where everything is just instantly perfect and to scale was downright brilliant.
Background Pony #3295
I think the current policy goes too far. Recently my image that had pretty good ratings got deleted, and I suppose it was because a “fake signature” it contained. I haven’t even noticed it when uploading, and I think when the image looks good overall, such a little unimportant detail shouldn’t be a reason to delete it. I understand bad anatomy is a good reason to delete an image, but not something like this. It makes me think about not uploading anything here altogether.
(Sorry that I’m posting this message as well as the AI images anonymously, I have some reasons not to reveal my identity here.)
LightningBolt 
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #3295
Take it as a lesson to look over what you generate before uploading it, if you didn’t see the fake signature then you didn’t really look over it beforehand.
Take it as a lesson to look over what you generate before uploading it, if you didn’t see the fake signature then you didn’t really look over it beforehand.
The Frowning Pony
Administrator
13 blinks per minute
@Background Pony #3295
@LightningBolt
There are also a myriad of ways of cleaning up artifacts like those, through AI tools or external editors.
@LightningBolt
There are also a myriad of ways of cleaning up artifacts like those, through AI tools or external editors.
T6J2E5 
Verified blank-flank
…if you didn’t see the fake signature then you didn’t really look over it beforehand.
That’s not necessarily true. If an image is very complex, then one could stare at it for hours without seeing everything. I don’t know the image BP was talking about, but I hesitate to make blanket statements.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@T6J2E5
I looked at it and it’s impossible to miss the fake signature.
I looked at it and it’s impossible to miss the fake signature.
Background Pony #3295
Yeah, I know what I need to do to follow the rules. I’m just not sure if I want to follow them, because I don’t think that kind of thing makes the image look any less good.
(According to the announcement on the purplesmart.ai Discord server, the pony model v5 will not generate these fake signatures. It doesn’t say anything about the ability to generate hands correctly though, that would be way more important to me.)
The image is not complex, it’s just that after seeing lots of AI-generated images, I got used to this kind of things to the point of not paying attention to them.
Background Pony #A3CA
@Background Pony #3295
Hi, user who reported your image here. It was a nice image and I don’t really think the signature smudge detracted from it - just that as long as rules exist, they should be enforced or/until changed.
Hi, user who reported your image here. It was a nice image and I don’t really think the signature smudge detracted from it - just that as long as rules exist, they should be enforced or/until changed.
While I’m not privy to the actual reasoning behind the rules, what came to mind about that rule in particular is that one of the drama points I’ve seen surrounding AI generated images is “look it even included a signature, that’s proof it steals art!” and requiring images not have them could be a preventative measure against that.
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
I don’t think that kind of thing makes the image look any less good.
A signature suggests that someone created the image by hand, which is not true for
ai generated images. Although that’s not rule-breaking here, it certainly can cause confusion or be misleading.More importantly, if the signature on the AI-generated image happens to be similar to a signature of a known artist or designer, it can increase the likelihood of the image being flagged for possible Rule #1 infringement, even if the image itself is different from that artist’s work.
So, if you see a signature on your
ai generated work, it is a very good idea to take the time to remove it. Background Pony #3295
Fine, I’ll keep that in mind next time I want to upload an AI image here.
Rainboom Dash
Rainbooms4Ever
Would the thing in the lower left of this be considered a signature? >>3050065 (deleted)
Definitely this in the upper left, right? >>3050324 (deleted)
Definitely this in the upper left, right? >>3050324 (deleted)
Yeah, I think second one would be counted as a signature but idk about the first one..
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
Would the thing in the lower left of this be considered a signature? >>3050065 (deleted)
That looks like maybe it’s just a random blob to me. It’s cute that on the extreme lower right there’s some sort of party hat though.
Definitely this in the upper left, right? >>3050324 (deleted)
For me, it’s not legible enough to be plausibly anyone’s signature. It’s fascinating to me that the lower right of that image has the same party hat.
Is the party hat some sort of logo from the generator? Anyone know what’s causing that?
Rainboom Dash
Rainbooms4Ever
@Ciaran
party hat is the purplesmart.ai watermark, yes
I think it’s also a unicorn horn, not a party hat but whatever
hmm… nah, the tip isn’t pointy enough
party hat is the purplesmart.ai watermark, yes
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!