Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 806
TB Tabby 
When I click “Random Watched Image,” it always shows me the newest watched image instead of a random one. Is that happening for anyone else?
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 805
Princess Luna 
Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
The Post anonymously option does not affect the preview for comments.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 804
Clover the Clever 
Lord and Saviour
Navigation should be fixed now.
Good to hear that updating service packs helped your web browser issues.
Good to hear that updating service packs helped your web browser issues.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 803
Background Pony #320D
Btw, finally fixed my error. Had to install some service pack updates (I normally shy clear from those as they severely slow down my connection at times) and update to IE v11. No more “derpibooru cache view mode”. Suggest Nights look into updating those.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 802
~Zarkith
Same issue here with latest Chrome on Windows 7. I thought it was just derping while the site update was underway, but it’s still broken.
The two navigation arrows (previous, next) don’t work, they keep reloading the current image. The find image (up arrow) produces an empty page.They worked yesterday (at least the up arrow worked).Is it just me, or can you not click the arrows, or type k, for the next image to load anymore? It just refreshes the current image. This is an issue when I try to fix tags for multiple images in a short time span as it takes longer to load each image in it’s own tab, instead of just typing the k key after every edit…
I am using Firefox if this is the issue.I am also having this issue. Far as I can tell, it started sometime between friday and saturday night. I use chrome on windows 8.1.
Same issue here with latest Chrome on Windows 7. I thought it was just derping while the site update was underway, but it’s still broken.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 800
Background Pony #47FB
Sometimes, when viewing an image on mobile, one or more of the tags will randomly be slightly larger in font size than the others. For example, in mobile Safari, >>746319 has an unusually large “background pony strikes again” tag.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 799
Seergun 
I am also having this issue. Far as I can tell, it started sometime between friday and saturday night. I use chrome on windows 8.1.
The two navigation arrows (previous, next) don’t work, they keep reloading the current image. The find image (up arrow) produces an empty page.They worked yesterday (at least the up arrow worked).
Is it just me, or can you not click the arrows, or type k, for the next image to load anymore? It just refreshes the current image. This is an issue when I try to fix tags for multiple images in a short time span as it takes longer to load each image in it’s own tab, instead of just typing the k key after every edit…
I am using Firefox if this is the issue.
I am also having this issue. Far as I can tell, it started sometime between friday and saturday night. I use chrome on windows 8.1.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 798
Mad Black 
I actually thought about to do this since a while. (One is because //C: is pretty full and I don’t know exactly why. And the system is running pretty slow lately, with a lot going on in the background. Probably need a dedusting too.)
Problem is that my disc drive doesn’t work anymore, and I never formatted to zero before and have no experience with it.
As I said, the laptop I am working on isn’t very new…
@Mad Black
Formatting the disk and reinstalling the OS?
I actually thought about to do this since a while. (One is because //C: is pretty full and I don’t know exactly why. And the system is running pretty slow lately, with a lot going on in the background. Probably need a dedusting too.)
Problem is that my disc drive doesn’t work anymore, and I never formatted to zero before and have no experience with it.
As I said, the laptop I am working on isn’t very new…
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 797
Background Pony #6E26
Is it just me, or can you not click the arrows, or type k, for the next image to load anymore? It just refreshes the current image. This is an issue when I try to fix tags for multiple images in a short time span as it takes longer to load each image in it’s own tab, instead of just typing the k key after every edit…
I am using Firefox if this is the issue.
I am using Firefox if this is the issue.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 796
BigMax 
@Mad Black
I have no clue to help you, sorry.
Reinstalling the browser, maybe?
Formatting the disk and reinstalling the OS?
I have no clue to help you, sorry.
Reinstalling the browser, maybe?
Formatting the disk and reinstalling the OS?
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 794
BigMax
@Mad Black
Uhm, Ubuntu is Linux.
And yes, Microsoft vowed to churn out new versions of Windows more often.
The time when it left us with the same OS and browser for 5 friggin’ years is over. It’s terribly behind on the mobile OS war and even its desktop dominance could be in discussion in the future.
Uhm, Ubuntu is Linux.
And yes, Microsoft vowed to churn out new versions of Windows more often.
The time when it left us with the same OS and browser for 5 friggin’ years is over. It’s terribly behind on the mobile OS war and even its desktop dominance could be in discussion in the future.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 793
BigMax
@Grieffon
It’s definitely a server problem, the browser used has nothing to do with it.
@Mad Black
Surely Java has nothing to do with Derpibooru, but perhaps has something to do with the stability of your system.
Just to make it clear, Java is not Javascript and their execution enviroments on a browser is completely different.
It’s definitely a server problem, the browser used has nothing to do with it.
@Mad Black
Surely Java has nothing to do with Derpibooru, but perhaps has something to do with the stability of your system.
Just to make it clear, Java is not Javascript and their execution enviroments on a browser is completely different.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 792
Mad Black
@Mad Black
I updated JAVA to the latest version, and looked like it worked, for a moment, but then it crashed in Firefox and Chrome. So I guess I have to use the normal filter for now.
Which is kinda sad, because at first they worked fine when I tested it with a very easy filtering set. hide: (plot AND (explicit OR questionable)
Then I added more to the spoilers and hide section and it stopped working. At first it displayed all the filters instead of hiding/spoiling them.
Then I deleted the new setting from my standard filer and made a new filter to test it out, and it stopped working at all.
I updated JAVA to the latest version, and looked like it worked, for a moment, but then it crashed in Firefox and Chrome. So I guess I have to use the normal filter for now.
Which is kinda sad, because at first they worked fine when I tested it with a very easy filtering set. hide: (plot AND (explicit OR questionable)
Then I added more to the spoilers and hide section and it stopped working. At first it displayed all the filters instead of hiding/spoiling them.
Then I deleted the new setting from my standard filer and made a new filter to test it out, and it stopped working at all.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 791
Mad Black
I kinda have some problems with the complex filters. Or rather the code doesn’t want to run correctly. On chrome it just says that “You don’t appear to have JavaScript enabled”, but it is. But the site doesn’t want to load.
And in Firefox it crashes completely.
But if I use a filter without the complex setting, it seems to work just fine.
I use a 5 year old Laptop with Windows 7 if that helps. And the browsers update automatically and should be up to date.
So I guess it is a local problem. Most probably with java script itself. Which is on Version 10.67.2.1 at the moment.
And in Firefox it crashes completely.
But if I use a filter without the complex setting, it seems to work just fine.
I use a 5 year old Laptop with Windows 7 if that helps. And the browsers update automatically and should be up to date.
So I guess it is a local problem. Most probably with java script itself. Which is on Version 10.67.2.1 at the moment.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 790
Grieffon 
h
I think the complex filter causes some search results to show blank thumbnails. Filters without complex command still works normally.
Here’s my current complex filter:
(inflation AND (explicit OR questionable OR artist:40450))
((irl human AND cosplay) AND NOT artist:sukistar)
Which for some reason, causes searching “shipping” or viewing the tag “shipping” to show blank thumbnails. Adding anything to shipping, e.g. “shipping,rd”, will show normal results. It’s the same for Chrome, IE, and FF.
Here’s my current complex filter:
(inflation AND (explicit OR questionable OR artist:40450))
((irl human AND cosplay) AND NOT artist:sukistar)
Which for some reason, causes searching “shipping” or viewing the tag “shipping” to show blank thumbnails. Adding anything to shipping, e.g. “shipping,rd”, will show normal results. It’s the same for Chrome, IE, and FF.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 789
Mad Black
Or he could wait a few moths longer and get Windows 10. (Is it me or a new versions of windows coming out pretty fast nowadays.)
Or he could get a free version of Linux, Ubuntu or any other open source software.
And IE isn’t the best browser anyway. Firefox or Chrome are in many things and tasks superior.
@NiGHTS4life
It depends on if you can. If you’re using Windows Vista, you can’t.
If it’s Win7-8, you can and you damn should! Even better, upgrade to IE 11.
Or he could wait a few moths longer and get Windows 10. (Is it me or a new versions of windows coming out pretty fast nowadays.)
Or he could get a free version of Linux, Ubuntu or any other open source software.
And IE isn’t the best browser anyway. Firefox or Chrome are in many things and tasks superior.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 788
BigMax
@NiGHTS4life
It depends on if you can. If you’re using Windows Vista, you can’t.
If it’s Win7-8, you can and you damn should! Even better, upgrade to IE 11.
It depends on if you can. If you’re using Windows Vista, you can’t.
If it’s Win7-8, you can and you damn should! Even better, upgrade to IE 11.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 787
BigMax
Granted that he really should upgrade his OS (is Linux a possibility? If you don’t want to spend money, it’s either that or warez), XP stopped receiving security patches only this April - and then it got another extra one for a really bad breach affecting IE.
XP stopped receiving new software from Microsoft since… 2010, IIRC. No new version of Office, no new versions of Internet Explorer.
Not that this makes the situation much better. Really, if you’re using WinXP swap to another browser at least.
Please upgrade your computer’s operating system. You haven’t had security updates for years so if your machine isn’t full of viruses by now it’s only by isolation and luck.
Granted that he really should upgrade his OS (is Linux a possibility? If you don’t want to spend money, it’s either that or warez), XP stopped receiving security patches only this April - and then it got another extra one for a really bad breach affecting IE.
XP stopped receiving new software from Microsoft since… 2010, IIRC. No new version of Office, no new versions of Internet Explorer.
Not that this makes the situation much better. Really, if you’re using WinXP swap to another browser at least.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 785
Clover the Clever
Lord and Saviour
@TexasUberAlles
Sorry, I’ve been dealing with assholes all weekend and people trying to be helpful get bunched in with the rest.
My statement on XP being EOL and something you should actively be trying to move away from still stands. At least one of the other users with IE-related issues is on Win7, in any case.
Without any developers able to reproduce this we need actionable information on what exactly is going wrong when the page loads; we expect it to completely fail on WinXP/IE, we don’t expect anything to fail on IE >= 8 on an OS >= Win7. We need network request information and console output at minimum as a starting point.
Sorry, I’ve been dealing with assholes all weekend and people trying to be helpful get bunched in with the rest.
My statement on XP being EOL and something you should actively be trying to move away from still stands. At least one of the other users with IE-related issues is on Win7, in any case.
Without any developers able to reproduce this we need actionable information on what exactly is going wrong when the page loads; we expect it to completely fail on WinXP/IE, we don’t expect anything to fail on IE >= 8 on an OS >= Win7. We need network request information and console output at minimum as a starting point.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 784
TexasUberAlles 
@Clover the Clever
I wasn’t complaining, FFS, I was trying to be helpful by seeing if I could load the site in an old version of IE on my end and suggesting a possible cause for a problem that has thus far eluded identification. Since, y’know, an obsolescent OS kindasorta might be a legitimate reason for–
I wasn’t complaining, FFS, I was trying to be helpful by seeing if I could load the site in an old version of IE on my end and suggesting a possible cause for a problem that has thus far eluded identification. Since, y’know, an obsolescent OS kindasorta might be a legitimate reason for–
we’re trying to figure out what particular little facet of your setup is causing this
Any time you feel like paypallin’ me a few hundred spare USDs to buy a more modern computer, you just let me know; until then I’ll go ahead and stick with my “Use third party antivirus and Windows Embedded Industry updates and refrain from being a click-happy idiot online” strategy with the XP machines I’ve already paid for, thanks.
…Jeebus Crunk, man, I was trying to help.
…Jeebus Crunk, man, I was trying to help.
Site and Policy » Report site bugs here » Post 783
Clover the Clever
Lord and Saviour
@TexasUberAlles
Windows XP was end-of-lifed years ago. Windows 7 was released almost exactly 6 years ago now. Windows XP has serious issues with modern SSL technologies like TLS, and we choose rather than to support browsers almost a decade out of date and compromise the integrity of our HTTPS service to simply support current modern browsers (Only IE6/7/8 on XP are unsupported by Derpibooru - literally everything else is). This was changed recently in response to the HTTPS POODLE attacks on SSLv3 which forced the final retirement of that particularly ancient protocol.
Please upgrade your computer’s operating system. You haven’t had security updates for years so if your machine isn’t full of viruses by now it’s only by isolation and luck.
Windows XP was end-of-lifed years ago. Windows 7 was released almost exactly 6 years ago now. Windows XP has serious issues with modern SSL technologies like TLS, and we choose rather than to support browsers almost a decade out of date and compromise the integrity of our HTTPS service to simply support current modern browsers (Only IE6/7/8 on XP are unsupported by Derpibooru - literally everything else is). This was changed recently in response to the HTTPS POODLE attacks on SSLv3 which forced the final retirement of that particularly ancient protocol.
Please upgrade your computer’s operating system. You haven’t had security updates for years so if your machine isn’t full of viruses by now it’s only by isolation and luck.
Showing results 11776 - 11800 of 12582 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |