They stopped tagging these with artist names even when trained on specific artists long ago because big artists threathened to sue.
Thank you for finally reporting some images. Although, your reports are completely useless. A well formed Rule #1 report should at the very least include the name of the artist whose work you believe is being emulated or whose copyright is being violated, and ideally should include an example of WHY you believe this, whether it’s a link to the image that was traced, or images by the artist that have similar characteristics to the image you reported.
Just reporting any random image for Rule #1 for the reason “You know what this report is about” or “doing your job for you” is … seriously, stop that.
If you’re going to report an image for Rule #1, provide the documentation that supports your claim. Tell us WHO you think is being emulated, and show us WHY you think that is happening.
… if Derpys policiy is “we will only delete pictures aping artists styles if we have writen proof by the guy making his computer shit them out that he trained it on them” then yeah, no pictures ever will get deleted
We delete ai generated images for Rule #1 if they look like they are emulating an artist’s style. We’ve deleted 11 such images in just the last couple of weeks, including banning the prompters when they won’t stop.
From Rule #1:
• Do not use AI to emulate an artist’s personal style without clear approval from the artist … Unintentional “style copying” due to model biases may be deleted after review.
But you have never provided even a SINGLE example of someone’s style being emulated. You just keep complaining that LoRAs exist.
