Uploaded by Background Pony #880D
3606x3143 JPG 3.45 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
redraw
Tags
+-SH safe2258313 +-SH artist:mirroredsea641 +-SH fluttershy268122 +-SH pegasus532198 +-SH pony1689770 +-SH g42118717 +-SH :o6961 +-SH bust82871 +-SH close-up9453 +-SH cute278668 +-SH extreme close-up395 +-SH face1790 +-SH female1898513 +-SH high res412469 +-SH looking at something5585 +-SH mare799034 +-SH open mouth255254 +-SH portrait43972 +-SH shyabetes20251 +-SH solo1498371 +-SH surprised13456
Loading...
Loading...
you came back eight months later to restart this?
As Dash said 8 months ago, the image itself has no slime, and art as detailed as you’re describing are very different to the image here. Tag what’s in the image, not what you want to see (there is no shortage of vore art already).
The inside of the mouth is slimy, it’s part of basic anatomy.
The top and side of the tongue is covered with taste buds, also part of basic anatomy.
Then that description needs to be fixed to prevent anymore confusion.
Exactly and as I said, open mouth is implied by the tag because it’s always included by it, however an open mouth isn’t always a maw shot. That’s for vore related in spirit and that’s not the intent on these
Yes but… that often has fetish implications too. That’s clearly not the intent of this picture
Short description: image with a view into a character’s mouth
Implies: open mouth
Yes, but whereas open mouth applies to this, maw shot does not, and open mouth doesn’t imply maw shot
Mawshot implies open mouth.
I’d say those were valid removals as I don’t see slimy, taste buds, or maw shot applying to this
The one who added the improper tags that ZONESS removed.
Then to whom should I say that? 😕
ZONESS isn’t the one you should be saying that to.
Leave the tags alone