Uploaded by bustoblaster 
635x4290 PNG 456 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
that I havent completely destroyed yet?
Tags
+-SH questionable121925 +-SH artist:cartoonlion1041 +-SH apple bloom60380 +-SH applejack201726 +-SH fluttershy260185 +-SH rainbow dash281816 +-SH scootaloo59047 +-SH oc954982 +-SH oc:futashy554 +-SH human248451 +-SH ask futashy282 +-SH futaverse401 +-SH g42044303 +-SH balls110878 +-SH breasts394724 +-SH christmas21141 +-SH comic136290 +-SH futa62198 +-SH futa fluttershy5066 +-SH humanized120476 +-SH intersex64629 +-SH nudity517148 +-SH sled281 +-SH snow19782 +-SH winter6392
Loading...
Loading...
For agreeing with you and suggesting a place where you can discuss why you think the rule is wrong? Makes me wonder what your attitude is towards someone who’s insulting and rude as they disagree with you.
i don’t like you people
_From the tagging guidelines: “Explicit - Content which contains exposed genitals…” There’s nothing in there about an exception for non-sexual nudity.
Can’t say I agree with it, but that’s the rule, and the place to argue against it is the forum, not on an image post.
Read your mind guidelines. No sexual acts presented yet natural genetalia present = Questionable
Read the tagging guidelines, visible genitals = explicit
By “those three pictures” do you mean the Applecest pics Cartoonlion did as commissions?
Oh wait, does RD still have to make up for TPing her farm?