I remember Red from OSP talking about how villains trying to destroy the world is ironically considered more child friendly than a murderer trying to kill a single person.
She asserts that because the human mind technically isn’t equipped to grasp the true size of the world, the audience will subconsciously give up and check out emotionally and therefore won’t feel like that’s as awful as pointing a gun at a single person.Same deal as “If ten people die it’s a tragedy, but if 300,000 people die it’s a statistic.”That’s probably is why writers like to default to “save the world “. It comes with less emotional baggage to navigate than having to save people the protagonist personally cares about because that would require delving into a character’s actual feelings such as anger, love, grief and fear which is far more difficult to write well.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!