@Kiryu-Chan
Free speech isn’t simply a discussion around what the government does. That’s a discussion around the 1st Amendment specifically. The 1st Amendment WAS implemented as a protection around the concept of free speech so that the government, who in our society wields the most power, can’t use abuse that power.
So free speech as a concept is not limited by that. Anybody can call anybody out if you don’t like what they say. The discussion as far as free speech goes is how we as citizens decide to act, we have a responsibility of our own. The conversation around where do we go when it comes to “Calling out others”, what does this mean? Do we simply point out that something someone is saying is wrong, or do we demand they be de-platformed? If you’re in college and some student group wants to invite a speaker they want to hear from, but you don’t like, do you go to the dean to pressure them to disinvite them? Do you protest? How do you protest? Their is no set point in the sand you can draw and just say “This is acceptable, this isn’t”. One one extreme you don’t want institutions to be forced to give a platform to EVERYONE no matter what they say, it would be wrong to force Twitter to allow anyone on the platform and to hell with the TOS, but on the other extreme you don’t want people forming little bubbles where wrong think results in alienation. So the free speech conversation is about where do we draw the line, and how do we treat each other.