@Meanlucario
Aside from that, how can they kill a person with their terms of service?
With what poison?
Is there a hitman hired by a corporation who can track someone who created that account?
Is a VR app pulling a Sword Art Online?
I don’t wanna laugh at a cruel joke that I can’t find it funny, I’m sorry.
Because by agreeing to the ToS Disney argues/argued (don’t know the state of the case) that the customer entered an agreement with them, the company to enter into an arbitration agreement. Arbitration being you enter into a strictly private, closed door process to settle damages done to you, the customer from the company that is not open to public legal discovery for the purpose of criminal or even civil cases. For example: you can not enter a class-action lawsuit against Disney for damages you and others have suffered from Disney, because to get Disney streaming - or any other streaming - you agreed to never take them to court, but to negotiate damages with them 1 on 1 in a private setting. A setting which is always advantageous to the company because it would break the ToS and run you into any clauses seeking penalties vs you for entering the agreement.
And so: Disney decided to extended Disney+ Terms of Services to all Disney services including the parks because either it was written into the ToS in fine print or the language used was for Disney the Company as a whole and not in part (streaming).
IF the case has been presented to you as being “Disney+ directly killed a person” then you’re incorrect, or the source of that information is wildly incorrect and misrepresenting the case as-it-is and you’re not even approaching this for the correct narrative. No one has ever said streaming has killed a person, in any publication. Rather: the Terms of Services someone has entered into a company has or is being argued to prevent a person for seeking damages from the Company for something they did disconnected from the Streaming Platform.
Kind of like how if you didn’t email Discord’s arbitration team a couple months back to quit their arbitration agreement in their new Terms of Service you can’t sue them in public court with other people anymore for when they “woopsie, we leaked all ur information again :3”, and you have to enter into a private 1 on 1 arbitration settlement with them and get like, fifty bucks. That’s what Disney is trying to do and what any similar case is or will try to do