Sexy Eris

Oh, cool, a watermarkless version!

@Warmitchine  
The old version apparently had a watermark. Then a new version was uploaded much later, with no watermark.
 
(I say apparently because it still took me a good while to notice it.)

Despite searching I have yet to actually locate this supposed watermark. Unless by watermark you mean the wet cement, in which case I see that.

Penis: Um…..?

@kevinsano  

@Faeiity @Alara Rogers  
Jane Seymour is 62. Need someone with a young face too? Then try  
 
Rachel True, 48, was still getting cast as a teenager in her early 30s.

What watermark is everyone talking about??
 
…
 
Oh. That one. Yeah, that’s really obtrusive and distracting. /sarcasm

@Background Pony #F360  
Well, personally, I don’t care enough to go search for existing forum posts and write one if it doesn’t already exist. You can do that. (Do post a link, though.)

@Blacklight Shining  
Now that actually describes the issue with the watermark.

@Background Pony #F360  
Perhaps it should be changed, then, to read distracting watermark.

@Background Pony #F360  
>rather than just exists literally outside of the angle of sight.
 
Close enough to it to disrupt the image’s color blob. I don’t perceive Kevin’s signature, but I do perceive the watermark.

@Blacklight Shining
 
@Barhandar  
I suppose my standard of distracting and yours is different, so there’s that. A semi-transparent watermark on the middle is far more obtrusive than any watermark in the corner could ever be because it actually disrupts the focus rather than just exists literally outside of the angle of sight.
 
Looking at the tag, it would seem it’s just applied randomly, regardless of size, position, or transparency, which makes me wonder what, if anything, it’s doing.

@Blacklight Shining  
Distracting yes, covers the focus of the image no.

@Background Pony #F360  
It’s very much distracting and thus falls under my understanding of the tag. To my knowledge, if [obtrusive watermark] does not cover this, then there is no tag that does, and it would merit a downvote.

>obtrusive watermark  
Obtrusive to what? Someone really wants to look at that fence and get their kicks out of it or something?

That goatee was the reason why I didn’t fave this pic. Otherwise, pretty sexy.

@ldmt1995  
mission accomplished

Why does she have a goatee it’s… disturbing.

@RektPony  
As a female who is attracted to John de Lancie… if there had been a female version of JdL-Q who looked like a 20-something, I would have been deeply disappointed. JdL was 40-something when Star Trek aired, and I would have wanted to see a female version to be at least in her late 30’s if not 40’s.
 
Now, it’s damn hard to genderswap live action characters and make them not look like ass, but it’s easy to do with cartoons. Female Discord should have a shorter muzzle than male Discord, but not a short, cute mare muzzle, because male Discord’s muzzle is much longer than a stallion’s, so a female draconequus muzzle should be at least as long as a male pony’s, if not longer. It should also be skinnier, because again, that’s what Discord’s looks like. The artist should feminize Discord by making the face slightly curvier and less sharp, the body less angular but still bigger than Celestia because the size difference between ponies and Discord is so extreme and Discord’s much taller than Celestia (at least a foot when she’s reared up on two legs; there is not normally a difference of a foot between men and women who are otherwise genetically similar).
 
I don’t like this picture, because it looks like a young male Discord with tits glued on; mares don’t have breasts, so giving them to Eris is kind of cheating by going anthro. The face isn’t mature-looking, but it’s still very masculine. I’d prefer a longer, older, but distinctly more feminine face. Riquis101 has done some beautiful R63 Discords (Riquis calls that version Discordia, not Eris), and there’s another artist whose name I forget, and Zabchan has done some gorgeous humanized mature-lady Eris.
 
I really do feel like the standard R63 of Discord looks like Discord’s daughter. But then, I also think that the standard R63 of Fluttershy looks like Flutters has been taking male hormones, not a good adaptation of what Fluttershy is at all. R63 Fluttershy should be more like Big Mac – because Fluttershy is very, very feminine in appearance, but her behavior is more oriented around being shy, I’ve felt for some time that R63 Fluttershy (and I hate the name Butterscotch, where did it even come from) should be a big, masculine-looking, very shy pony who ducks his head a lot and blushes and tries not to talk much in public. Not as big as Big Mac, since Big Mac is kind of special that way, but maybe the size of Shining Armor. That would make his shyness stand out in contrast to his physical appearance the way that Fluttershy’s shyness contrasts with her model-esque beauty; the way he’s normally drawn, it’s like, why is that even a genderswap? I can get why Elusive looks like a flamboyant gay dude, because he’s a fashion designer. He totally is a flamboyant gay dude. Rarity’s super-feminine persona is just that, a persona, so Elusive has to have a similar one, and only the flamboyant gay dude fits with fashionista. But R63 Fluttershy looks totally wrong as a tiny, wimpy-looking waify colt. Fluttershy’s a frigging model. Her counterpart should have equivalent traditional masculine beauty. The one who should look waify and pretty would be Rainbow Blaze or whatever his name is, to contrast with Rainbow Dash looking butch and also because his personality totally doesn’t fit it so you get an Edward Elric “I AM NOT SHORT AND CUTE!” thing going on.

@RektPony  
Hm, I guess it’s just me then. She looks like 25 there. https://derpiboo.ru/844224 This ( i don’t know how to paste pictures and I don’t know if links work. Sorry bro!) is what I would call a old looking Eris. In human years i’d say she was about 50 or so. Also, that neck thing is SO PRETTY

@Faeiity  
I don’t see the short-haired Eris with small muzzle as “young”. She strike me more as somewhere around Ellen Degeneres age and form, and she isn’t young  

@RektPony  
True, it is 100% personal taste. I simply think that, if a character looks old, that a R63 version should also look old. If you look through the Eris tag, you’ll find that almost all of them look about as young as the mane six. Given that there is no real canon R63 Eris, no version of her can be wrong. Nonetheless, I have a special place in my heart for not cute and old looking Eris, and I can’t help but love them.
 
What do little girls having a crush on Discord have to do with Eris? Also, Janeway isn’t ugly! D: SHE’S PURTTY!

@Faeiity  
Discord for majority is basically Q from star trek, and for female audience he was attractive. Is like saying that Janeway is ugly and her 63 version should also be that way. Is just a matter of your personal taste. Discord have manly traits while Luna or Celestia have feminine traits. You will react on opposite sex different way. There are a lot of little girls on deviant art having a childish crush on Discord. KP is only one of the more famous.

@RektPony  
Not at all! I said that he looks like a old goat, not that every goat must be old or that his head is old. It could just be that his head simply looks to be old, thought it doesn’t help that he’s like, 1000+ years old. The point is, Discord is old looking and is kind of ugly, and his female version should be as well. Surly it isn’t fair for EVERY R63 Discord to look way different from the original character age wise, yes? What if all R63 Granny Smith’s were all muscular? It simply wouldn’t fit with canon