Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Creations249 Etsy Shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive192508 artist:tomatocoup349 bow hothoof1439 windy whistles2962 pegasus507180 pony1627525 g42052930 and that's how rainbow dash was made50 awww229 bed59000 blushing279002 chest fluff67184 cowgirl position10241 cute269063 dilf457 duo178428 eyes closed141092 female1828362 flag5741 freckles45142 good clean married sex2131 heart78486 husband and wife2417 male559224 mare757699 married761 married couple1776 married couples doing married things555 married life110 milf13544 rainbow dash's parents385 sex174574 ship:windyhoof383 shipping257419 simple background608868 softcore3858 spread wings97313 stallion199522 straight181712 unshorn fetlocks48580 white background166390 windybetes325 wing hands3032 wing hold712 wingboner9709

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #903D
In North America, “Rooting for you” means “Cheering for you.”
In New Zealand, “Root” means “Fuck.”
Bow and Windy seem to put both together.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Mooniedrop  
The comments I replied to were comments directed at me personally. I’m just slow at responding sometimes.
 
@Darth Sonic  
There aren’t any current studies because the “research” you’re quoting is bunk, and there isn’t any evidence to impel more research in that direction.
 
All I’m trying to point out is that the veracity of your sources is important. It has to be scientific to be scientific.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Background Pony #4319  
@Mooniedrop  
It’s not ‘which institutions’, it’s whether or not a study passes peer review. The peer review system is designed to filter out unscientific garbage.
 
Here’s an actual scientific study from 1975: http://www.jstor.org/stable/583035
 
Things have improved substantially since then because the topic is no longer nearly as taboo now as it was 42 years ago. There aren’t a lot of research studies on the topic, however, because it’s not a common situation and there isn’t substantial evidence that it produces any specific difficulty in child-rearing or other family dynamics. So no, the assertion that “people in open marriages have problems” is inaccurate—and even if it weren’t, saying it in that way is prejudicial toward those of us (like me) who live in an open marriage and have no problems in our relationship at all.
Mooniedrop

@TricksterWolf  
what instituitions collate statistics that are acceptable to you? im pretty sure everyone can no-platform an opponents source of statistics. its pretty easy, after all, you just did it without expending even 20 calories and providing zero proof.
Background Pony #E4FA
@TricksterWolf  
Please provide a link to a credible publication then. Everything I happen to find comes from seemingly biased (one way or the other) sources.