Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Sky Railroad Merch Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

CalypsoFantasy
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition

Pre-1932 US car fan
Has literally no one mentioned yet that the book mentions a royal guard named Gleaming Shields?
 
That’s right, Gleaming Shields.
Background Pony #68C3
@Background Pony #2179  
You know, if you had actually bothered to read the comments you would see there’s at least a few people who’ve bought them and even enjoyed them, to some degree.
moonlightaveger

@Joshua  
Well. I thought that the first was weak but okay. Clearly targeted at young children. I really only bought Celestia’s because I wanted to see a story with her front and center. But this one really disappointed me. Well, like I said, I won’t be touching these again.
Background Pony #ED83
does anyone really “buy” these books? I mean yeah, LUNA is on the freakin cover so it will sell, but does anyone really care?
Background Pony #9349
@Background Pony #7DB5  
I have read all her MLP books except the Daring Do ones.  
They were all pretty good. Except the Rainbow Dash one, I just can’t figure out what is going on in that one.  
Despite the claims of the other BP in here, the use of language in her books is not low at all. I’d say it’s the same level as the show. In her latest book, Discord’s, she was talking about “thespian ponies”. Tell me what young infant uses the term thespian? None, I tell you. Just like the show the books are pro forma aimed at younger children, but it doesn’t show, the quality is good, and the difficulty level is not kept low. Sure, it’s no Shakespeare or Tolkien, there’s no Middle English or archaic literary language, but it’s absolutely no “toddler speak”.  
Even more importantly, her ponies all stay in character, they’re the personalities you know and love, and the style of the book mimics whoever the focus is.  
G.M. Berrow even impressed Meghan and her writers, she was offered to write an episode in S5. That alone already says a lot.  
I definitely recommend her books.
thps48
Solar Supporter - Fought against the New Lunar Republic rebellion on the side of the Solar Deity (April Fools 2023).
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Wallet After Summer Sale -

Young Leosword
@Background Pony #7DB5  
I never understand complaints of children’s products being targeted at children or even products labeled “fun for the family”. Like this and Pokemon and TT’s LEGO series.
 
Unrelated: Still haven’t found info on LEGO Marvel 2 besides the stuff from three months ago. :T
Background Pony #68C3
We’re not in S1 anymore. FIM has done episodes that are far too mature to be labeled a “kiddie show”.
 
MLP:FiM has some nice design and animation, appealing characterizations, and frequently-amusing dialog, and that’s enough to justify people outside the target audience watching it. But it’s still aimed at the 4-to-6-year-old crowd, as evidenced by the straightforward characterizations and standard plotlines that are nearly always played perfectly straight; there has yet to be an episode that I would question letting someone in that age bracket watch, even if a few lines of dialog might go over their heads or a few plot points may dig deeper than they realize at that age.
 
The G. M. Berrow books, from what I can gather, seem to do OK on characterization and to continue the tradition of simple, common plots played straight; what I’m wondering is, is she able to transcend the stereotypes of writing aimed at kindergartners and deliver amusing dialog and enjoyable prose, or are those elements of her books merely competent at advancing the story?
moonlightaveger

Since Luna actually does stuff in Celestia’s book, I wonder if Celestia will be useful in Luna’s book.
 
Man… I’m not touching another one of these ever again.
Background Pony #FF7C
@Background Pony #7DB5  
I’d consider them decent but you do need to take into account that they are written in such a way that a kid could read it. The plots and the writing are fine but theres just something a little off that you notice.
 
Oh and the first book ‘Twilight and the Crystal Heart Spell’, whilst not as bad as people make it out to be, isn’t all that great. Aside from that the only real downsides are some not great horse puns and one of the books having a Donut Steal just suddenly show up.
Background Pony #4F8A
@Background Pony #A12D  
We’re not in S1 anymore. FIM has done episodes that are far too mature to be labeled a “kiddie show”.
 
My point is that the books have really simplified plots and the general writing level is very clearly aimed at a younger crowd. To claim that is also true of FIM is simply wrong.