@Rainboom Dash  
https://goo.gl/images/MSr4TR
 
Here is a better link (I hope).

@Kelchan  
I would reference if it weren’t for an “access denied” notice
 
 
As I said, there probably is a grammar error… the fix just isn’t what you were saying in the beginning

@Rainboom Dash  
I don’t feel like doing that at the moment.
 
The argument was never about the “False Imprisonment” potion of the slogan. My entire argument was about the first part of the slogan. The first part of the slogan had a grammatical error that many people make, which is the correct use of the homonym Your/You’re.
 
Let’s take away the “False Imprisonment” portion just for this argument. It’s separated by a comma, which separates two statements in one sentence in this case. Thus, one statement can stand alone.
 
The correct and understandable way to convey to the reader what the lawyer, in this case, is offering them, is through the use of two contractions: “I’LL prove YOU’RE innocent” (“I WILL prove YOU ARE innocent”).
 
If you still can’t understand what I’m attempting to explain, you can always reference the image that inspired this ( https://i.pinimg.com/736x/fd/02/7b/fd027b7f574a7ad788a7c03be5ae2461–saul-goodman-better-call-saul.jpg ) and see how the artist bade a common mistake in transposing the slogan by misspelling the homonym.

@Kelchan  
…. except it’s all one thing
 
“I’ll prove your innocent, false imprisonment”
 
 
You know what, nvm…. let’s just drop this stupid conservation

@Rainboom Dash
 
The contraction of “I will” is “I’ll,” as in: “I will prove you are innocent.” I don’t know what’s not to understand in that section.
 
But if “Your” belongs in the sentence, then the word that needs to be corrected is “Innocence”, instead of “Innocent”. “Innocence” is something that CAN be possessed, as the word is a noun; whereas “Innocent” is an adjective, which cannot be possessed.
 
The second part of the slogan is just that: A slogan. Sentence fragments are commonly accepted for sales pitches, and this is not the part of the grammar headache I’m referring to.

@Kelchan  
Except it’s
 
“I’ll prove your innocent, false imprisonment”
 
Otherwise it’d be “I’ll prove you are innocent, false imprisonment”
 
Which makes no sense
 
Those 2 things go together… remove the comma if that helps… does the second one make sense? no… not to me, at least
 
You’re right… I don’t think the comma belongs there… but what you are saying makes no sense.. it’s not “your” that is the issue here.. that is correct
 
Actually, I think the comma does belong… you know… I’m no grammar expert, lol

@Rainboom Dash
 
The contraction of “you are” is “You’re”, as in: “I’ll prove you are innocent.”
 
“Your” is a possessive, in this case, “Your innocent”, if referring to me, would be “My innocent”, or, I possess an “innocent”.

@Kelchan  
Nope, it’s spelled correctly

you need to update to an OC tag.

You’re*
 
If you’re going to have a professional business card, it helps to proofread!