Uploaded by Background Pony #9061
808x3289 PNG 126 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH source needed27906 +-SH grimdark31668 +-SH artist:wolfram_sparks107 +-SH oc1007445 +-SH oc only737170 +-SH oc:kyle (wolfram sparks)2 +-SH fluffy pony7131 +-SH comic141748 +-SH crying58469 +-SH feral fluffy pony304 +-SH fluffy pony foals1140 +-SH fluffy pony grimdark2602 +-SH fluffy pony mother845 +-SH psychological abuse47 +-SH spaghetti981
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Probably the Human being abusive, I tend not to take the idea of Humans being this stupid and naive seriously.
That’s a broad assumption. The humans are usually (not always) the abusers, yes. But there’s plenty of previous evidence to suggest that fluffies can’t be trusted to be intelligent around spaghetti. They will eat spaghetti at every presented opportunity, right down to obvious traps and engineered horror.
Imagine a moment that the owner puts out the bowl of spaghetti, telling Kyle not to eat it all for himself. Most wild fluffies would ignore such an order to their own detriment, but Kyle being an actual living pet should be trained in obedience.
Owner brings the homeless fluffies, as a gesture of kindness to them and perhaps to give Kyle some company, to discover that Kyle got greedy and ate all the spaghetti. The owner knows who did it, of course, and gives some psychological punishment as he is forced to explain to the homeless fluffies without implicating Kyle (fluffies that are hungry enough will resort to cannibalism, and anger might hasten this reaction) and send them away.
Kyle feels guilty for his greed and learns how lucky he is to not be starving on the street. Harsh? Sure. Plausible? Absolutely.
Why though? the whole thing was engineered by his insane owner. He could always feed the fluffy family something else, but he chose not to because he wanted them to suffer. This is Fluffy Abuse, always assume everything is in the name of causing deliberate suffering.
Fluffle puff is not a fluffy pony. She is a fluffy pony as in she is a pony with a lot of fluff, not related at all to the fluffy ponies.
@Taupe_Hat
Agreed. I wish more abuse was like this.
Granted, I also wish more fluffy pony grimdark didn’t have as much human-on-fluffy abuse, but if it does come up I wish it was more like this.
#blamesweetiebelle
I also vouch that MixerMike didn’t make fluffy pony. The first fluffy pony thing was written on December 9th, 2011. Even if MixerMike got fluffle puff out just a bit before then, I still don’t think we can say he had any influence in fluffy ponies in any way.
MixerMike didn’t start fluffy pony. He made Fluffle Puff after fluffy ponies were a thing.
When did the idea for Fluffy Ponies to be the most abused thing in the fandom.
I mean the guy who started didn’t have any abuse in fact he keeps going on with his blog with no abuse!
I like to think he just forgot what his daddeh said because sketti is delicious.
Which do you think it was?