Uploaded by Background Pony #A503
700x510 PNG 91 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2256623 +-SH artist:jester18 +-SH rarity224931 +-SH classical unicorn5820 +-SH g42117308 +-SH cloven hooves17839 +-SH curved horn12727 +-SH drama3352 +-SH female1896753 +-SH feminism318 +-SH horn235479 +-SH leonine tail15404 +-SH looking at you280180 +-SH mouthpiece1358 +-SH prone37842 +-SH smiling428038 +-SH solo1497024 +-SH tumblr36668 +-SH unshorn fetlocks52369
Loading...
Loading...
While you’re on TV Tropes, look up “Poe’s Law”.
I can’t even tell anymore.
It was a joke. I have nothing against the sentiment, but the phrasing might have room for improvement.
A woman is shown as weak, incompetent, and ineffectual unless she dresses and behaves in a masculine manner, or is otherwise applauded for being “not like other girls.”
– Real Women Don’t Wear Dresses
You must only burn them all!
Also whenever I hear chicks complaining about ‘other girls’ I think of these two
Before you strawman feminism some more, at least know what you’re takling about.
@Background Pony #A7E0
You two also revived a half year old thread. You both should feel bad.
Do you assume only men use “boy” as an insult as well?
Universally, all people are jerks. You have no point.
I don’t know, men are the one who keep using “girl” as an insult.
Sorry, misread your last comment.
Yeah, good thing I never said that, it almost sounds like you were accusing me of something I never even implied. But I’d say all those TV shows were the antagonists are either popular, pretty or fashion-oriented might contribute to that mindset, or that little thing were women who dates many people are frowned upon or something like that.
!memecrunch.com/meme/AO1V/getting-real-tired-of-your-bullshit/image.png!
That source tends to be (for lack of a better term) other girls. Women are just as capable of petty , vindictive competitiveness and self-righteousness as men are, don’t fool yourself into thinking otherwise.
I will not say that. I’ll say that it comes from whatever source that paints those “other girls” in a bad light.
Not everyone reads the comment section before posting.
While this is very much a concern, please tell me you do not believe this to be something engineered by men…
Ok, that’s more understandable. The the thing is, this picture refers to a concept, which I suppose (based on the other comments) is foreign to people outside of tumblr. Not knowing that beforehand is not your fault at all, but on the other hand, you did make your post right under a clarification of what the pic was about.
If I had come across this picture on google images, should I have tried to facebook post it to see if my interpretation of thing picture was correct? Did the artist bothered to leave any sort of restrictive designation against peoples whose imagination does not align with their own?
And what makes the opinion in the comments section any more correct then my own?
I thought this was art, which was meant to be interpreted by people. Not some kind of empirically based instruction manual.
pls
Brain damage
Because it seems that you didn’t bother to check if your interpretation of the message of the pic was correct.
And why would I, or should I, do that first?