Uploaded by WatermelonRat
805x649 PNG 379 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH artist needed30095 +-SH safe2194369 +-SH artist:colorcopycenter21 +-SH applejack202179 +-SH rainbow dash282494 +-SH earth pony513288 +-SH pegasus505906 +-SH pony1624728 +-SH g42050236 +-SH american civil war55 +-SH civil war160 +-SH confederate48 +-SH duo177338 +-SH duo female33245 +-SH female1825187 +-SH fierce72 +-SH gun20951 +-SH imminent fight92 +-SH looking at each other35145 +-SH looking at someone16997 +-SH musket138 +-SH politics1808 +-SH saber175 +-SH show accurate27096 +-SH sword14923 +-SH union37 +-SH us army91 +-SH weapon41683
Loading...
Loading...
Why do I have the impression that Ireland is near-constantly involved in wars, revolutions, and militant political movements since the 16th-century “Tudor conquest of Ireland”?
Now listen well and listen good,the south was wrong to keep slavery as its main law and as an Irishman from Ireland,I’ll tell you to got back to your stupid KKK friends and As an Irish from Ireland that I state again,I will fight for liberty and freedom and that all men are created equal in the United States,Amen and God bless Ireland and America.
Sincerely the Irishman (2016).
Here, it is the reverse.
The Union used cavalry sabers too you know?
+1!
But all women are NOT sisters, That would be WEIRD.
War has no reason except this :the survivor is always the one fighting for what’s right.
-Gregory in Gregory Horror Show Night 09 by Naomi Iwata
well said.
“All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers.”- Francois Fenelon
This is true. The South WAS very dependent on slave labor to keep its plantations working. But that’s only half the reason (maybe 60% the reason, but whatever). The reality is, most white people in the south saw black people as inferior and feared the idea of equality.
Just look at the next 100+ years and you’ll know that that’s true.
Just look at the south today!
And we’ll stomp it right the fuck back down.
Was well aware of nullification. But unlike apologists of the 20th century, I consider slavery the primary reason “state’s rights” were brought up.
From the very beginning the South was not friendly to the idea of integrating into the North socially, technologically, or politically, and that’s part of the reason why they lost. An agrarian economy that places emphasis on a decentralized government is pretty much the exact opposite of what you want during any war, and the American Civil War relied on mechanization and production, something the South severely lacked.
States rights, along with Nullification, were highly debated right before the Civil War. What became the South believed that the power was held more by the individual states than the Federal government. The North believed that the Federal government had a higher say the same matters.
Nullification was one area of States vs. Feds that came up. South Carolina believed in states rights so much that, if a State didn’t agree with a bill or something passed by the Federal government, that State could nullify the law.
This is all a bit hazy since it was about 2 years since I took U.S. History. Check the Wikipedia page linked below. I glanced over it and believe it provides an accurate explanation –better than my own at least.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis
States’ rights for what, exactly…?
That’s the question to ask people who say that.
Nah slavery was the cake. They were pretty clear about that. It is people in this century eager to make the states rights icing the cake.