@Background Pony #10EE
I don’t really consider myself an artist, but if you don’t like my edits you can go see someone else’s content.

@WojTek-ツ
IA steals art from other parties in order to generate an image and that is the problem when IA generators start calling themselves artists and charging for images

@AngelDusk17
That does not make you an artist, it is as if you stole the image of a character and you will change it the minimum and present it as yours

@AngelDusk17
Nice one :)

@Pigat35
and to improve quality i use photoshop :)

That’s a great pear butter with done in AI great work :)

Your Pear Butter looks super gorgeous, how her eyes lights up with a cute grin.
(o^^o)

They actually used photoshop elements for this image. This is more of a signature, the point of the signature is to ensure the authenticity of this work than an actual watermark because they are not claiming it as copyright like a watermark would do, have you seen filthy folks from here or outside stealing A.I images to gain profit and claiming these as theirs?
Yes, that’s actually happening and i find it very unfairly for those who have put any effort whatsoever.

I can say on behalf of the actual prompters out there such as him that spent their time to retouch these with editing programs making them look worthwhile, and that’s dedication even if it may be effortless to others. Therefore, I find it justified their signature.

@Background Pony #10EE
I don’t consider myself an artist but I improve my results with Photoshop, maybe some enjoy it and others don’t, but I can’t please everyone, you can call me a fraud or pathetic, I’m really not interested in your opinion.

Putting a watermark on something an IA made is pathetic ,You are not an artist