Uploaded by Shimmering Spectacle 
3199x1600 PNG 3.09 MB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
With the recent short, it’s obvious that it’s just like the One Ring, where it possesses them and turns the wearer completely selfish and makes them chaotic as well, sure the ring turns the wearer invisible to most, yet wearing it around their neck is close enough to the medallion there.
And the pendant of doom
Why doesn’t she have a mark?
Where is the pendant of doom?
I’ve seen plenty of mysterious pendants too*, but I suppose medallions do have story/intrigue potential, even in non-magical settings, as they tend to be big enough to hide something inside.
excellent point there, however in my opinion, the term medallion sounds more intriguing then just pendent, makes one more mysterious then it usually seems, like the one in the first Indiana jones movie, that obviously had mysteries of it already.
apparently not, cause as Xinaf said, the necklace is a type of jewelry worn around a neck, where as a medallion is a metal piece that’s hooked ON a necklace
Edited
According to stricter definitions:
Medallion - the metal object itself, ‘no strings attached’ ;) A word closely related to ‘medal’
Necklace - strictly speaking, it would be the string, though calling the entire thing, medallion and string together, a necklace would not be unusual. Still, it’s formally more correct to say the medallion is hung on the necklace. In any case ‘a piece of jewelry worn around the neck’ is the usual definition. And it’s the string that is around the neck.
Another word you could use in this context is a pendant - a broader word than medallion, as it includes more varied jewelry, as long as it hangs from a necklace.
Aren’t they the same or similar?
It’s a medallion.
One necklace to find them
One necklace ton bring them all
And in the darkness bind them
WHY HAVEN’T I MADE THAT CONNECTION BEFORE!?
To dungeons deep and caverns old… ♪♪
Maybe that, Opaline doesn’t feel like she needs extra authority over Misty. She’s just that meek already. Like the Mane 5 I understand as they’ll oppose her, but Misty? She’s already loyal to her. Best she could do is make her extra subservient to her.
No I was just referencing Harry Potter as it’s the only other cursed object that is a necklace based.
“There was another cursed necklace in another fantasy series”
you mean the medallion itself?
your current filter.you think?
MYM seems like it will give more info to work with so we’ll see.
The Ring and Horcrux merely worked by exploiting/amplifying their existing wants and emotions, this seems to just flip their morality.
I think it must be because she doesn’t have a cutie mark or it was made for her and the necklace has a defense mechanism which makes others who wear it “bad”.
good to know
There was another cursed necklace in another fantasy series, that is the Locket of Salazar Slytherin from the Harry Potter series when Lord Voldemort made it a Horcrux. Like the ring of power it makes the wearer selfish and chaotic.
of what they can do to the wearer, yes.