Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Champions of Equestria

Derpibooru costs over $25 a day to operate - help support us financially!

Description:

safe1900255 artist:pokehidden885 pinkie pie233089 rainbow dash253286 twilight sparkle324672 earth pony330653 pegasus374317 pony1247803 unicorn411657 bed mane787 cuddle puddle341 cuddling9305 cuddling in bed63 cute225629 debate in the comments257 dishevelled187 featured image1011 female1537162 floppy ears61219 in bed298 indoors4679 lesbian105628 lying down28495 mare578437 on back28213 pinkiedash3512 polyamory7319 pony pile859 shipping222563 sleeping25765 smiling309522 snuggling6876 tongue out121853 twidash5540 twidashpie33 twinkie1940

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #AAF1
@Princess Luna
I listed them because they’re all things I frequently see tagged with what the artist wanted even if what the image shows would suggest otherwise. Hell there’s even a whole tag specifically for the third example. I often see tag wars and comment arguments on those kinds of images, and every time the mods have chosen the artist’s intent for the tags.
Posted Report
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@Background Pony #AAF1
Artist intent in general can be used as a last resort in ambiguous cases, but those are all things that shouldn’t generally need to use it, especially the first one due to its large effect on ratings.
@moonchosen
It can often take more than one mod to fix tags, with how unwieldy they can become.
Posted Report
Background Pony #AAF1
@saby
Artist intent also matters for: whether an image is considered to be rape, what gender the characters are, what age the characters are, and likely more that I can’t currently think of. On a site like e621 with a true “tag what you see” policy, none of those are up to the artist outside of lore tags.
saby
Speaking Fancy - Badge given to members that help with translations
Tree of Harmony - Drew someone's OC for the 2022 Community Collab
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Kinship Through Differences - Celebrated the 11th anniversary of MLP:FIM!
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Twinkling Balloon - Took part in the 2021 community collab.
Philomena - For helping others attend the 2021 community collab
Ten years of changes - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of MLP:FiM!

Moderator
extra fun at parties
@Background Pony #6BAC
“tag what you see” is not one of Derpibooru’s policies. On this website, the artist’s intent is what matters most.
Patently false. Artists’ intent only counts for one thing: whether affection or “safe” physical contact in the picture is shipping or not.
Posted Report
The Smiling Pony
Princess of Love - Extra special version for those who participated in the Canterlot Wedding 10th anniversary event by contributing art.
Tree of Harmony - Drew someone's OC for the 2022 Community Collab
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Thread Starter - Report site bugs here
A Really Hyper Artist - 500+ images under their artist tag
Kinship Through Differences - Celebrated the 11th anniversary of MLP:FIM!
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Philomena - For helping others attend the 2021 community collab

Somehow Omnipresent?
I’m just sitting over here with my popcorn, wondering why people are debating the implications of this image when the artist drew in indications that these ponies reek of sex, thus the vapor lines above them.
My dude, those “vapor lines” is how wooden walls looked like in the show.
Stop being horny all the time.
Posted Report
Background Pony #6BAC
@Princess Luna
Shit I could have sworn I got that from here. Anyway sorry for getting a tag added by making a couple offhand remarks, really not a big deal. It’s a really cute image regardless
Posted Report
JCV
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition

remember horse
@Fuedra
Pretty sure those are grooves in the tree trunk of Twilight’s library, which is where they’re sleeping. A sleepover in the Treebrary if you will.
Posted Report
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@Background Pony #6BAC
@Kalenz
It’s a rather vague implication to be sure, really only relying on hair frizzing (something that at least for Pinkie wouldn’t happen just from being partied out). I think this style of image stems from FiM itself tending to make romance literally just nuzzling, not being allowed to even kiss until the day of the wedding.
@Background Pony #AAF1
That’s not really correct. We just aren’t as strict as e621 with only tagging what’s seen. The main departure is with shipping images, like this one, where technically we don’t know from the image that the three are romantically/sexually involved, but it’s an easy inference to make from knowing the artist.
Posted Report