What kind of contest is this

@Background Pony #8CA2  
I wasn’t asking if August Bebel was German I was just saying that another man who he was named after was German.

@Warrior_Kitten  
Not if celestia gets to them next

I’m sorry, but do I see someone about to tell the tragic tale of darth plagueis the wise?

@DarkyBoode32  
artist is russian

August Bebel was the name of a German politician, and I wonder if the artist August Bebel names themselves after the politician.

I hope Next round is there sticking them up there asses

I hope it’s not just Oral, I’d love to be CV’d by Luna and help her score!

@Cedric Moon
 
Just to clarify as well, the point of the tag is so they don’t have to come across it in the first place. Coming across a piece you don’t like can ahh, ruin the mood, so to speak. I don’t see the harm in having the tag there, then everyone is happy and can move on <3
 
No-one here is trolling. Given the context in the image, the princesses are eating all the volunteers, and kids have been volunteered. The implication that they’re next is there, all people are asking for is a tag to avoid this kind of situation if they don’t like it in the future!
 
Think on it this way: If it comes up in another one of your comms, the people that blacklist the tag won’t be around so you won’t have to worry about any comments :)

@Cedric Moon  

 
And they can’t properly hide things without the implied child tag

@Cedric Moon  
The issue still is that the implied CP tag is missing, so as to prevent present and future pieces from appearing. And the fact other people have pointed this out goes to show it isnt just me. Maybe consider keeping the tag like many others would like done instead of trying to preserve your petty ego by attempting and failing to prove you did not realize what the sentence, when observed by people who could not read your mind, implied. Implication is real whether you want it to be or not, and getting upset is not going to change that. Leave the tag and let it be, is all we ask.

Otherwise there is an icon at the top with a crossed-out eye marked “hide”.  
Click on it and “magic”! The image you so fervently decry here will disappear from your field of vision forever. It takes a second to do and doesn’t require you to make a mess for something you’ve imagined in your head.
 
I AM the one who commissioned the image, so there’s no need to get me out of nonsense. I still know what I commissioned and it was never about kids getting eaten. This sentence is just one bullshit among so many others that you took at first degree!

@Cedric Moon
 
if they are mentioned it still makes it implied bud, I have uploaded enough lemons to know that, same with the implied scat tag as the dialogue is in the image. The reason this is coming up from multiple people is with the sexualized context of the image in combination with the specifically Human prey means it doesn’t paint a pretty picture. We are not trolling, or at least I am not, I simply want to know what tag to use so I don’t see this content when I am browsing derpi.

@Cedric Moon  
Thanks for the ad hoc and for dodging the question. Really helps your case. The issue is not what I interpret it to mean, but what the context the sentence in the image has. A lot can be inferred and its not my fault at all that is the case, it’s literally human nature. And its not my fault I seriously dislike anything related to CP, be it implied or directly, and want it tagged correctly so I may not see it, its just how I am wired. Blaming me for using my brain is arbitrary and irrelevant to the argument. The fact it is even inferable is grounds for tagging imo. If the mods disagree, so be it, they have authority here.

You’re the one who gets carried away with a stupid sentence that’s nothing more than second-degree like the rest of the audience’s reactions…  
Outside of that sentence, where are the children in the picture? Where are they? Where? You can’t make out anything or anyone! So, it’s you who imagines them or there are none!  
There’s even a Star Wars 3 line… And with that one? It’s a satanist sentence that incites racial hatred? You’re really going too far.
 
We’re on a picture where 2 magic ponies princesses eat volunteering humans to win a contest where the prize is a cake!  
You’ll have to explain to me how you can take something here so stupid seriously?! Really!

@Cedric Moon  
bro thats still iffy as hell, its not the same context as the simpsons either, its under a very fetishy context and throwing even a reference to children should be tagged or avoided.
 
If anything running to the mods as soon as people point out something that looks bad and putting it under the guise of an attack, looks really bad.

There are no children in this picture  
Anyone who sees it, you are dangerous people, trolls or SJWs.  
There’s only one stupid sentence from an episode of The Simpsons where Homer tells the aliens they can eat his wife and kids, nothing else…  
I warned the moderation anyway because your attacks are out of line.

Why offer your kids?  
Offer your ex and then you can finally see your kids.

Yeah…I mean the age of the “kids” isn’t stated, but it’s pretty clear it’s heavily implied they are underage. Implied CP should have a tag anyway tbh, it fits here.

The eating kids comment in the bottom left corner is gross

Is this a vore drive? :3

@323Emberscales  
It’s not a story a jedi would tell you…