Uploaded by Damaged 
2250x2250 JPG 379 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
She has several peer reviewed papers you should read afterwards
Tags
+-SH explicit474089 +-SH artist:tjpones3977 +-SH sci-twi31482 +-SH twilight sparkle359059 +-SH human247202 +-SH equestria girls256984 +-SH g42038834 +-SH ...3254 +-SH adorkable4358 +-SH areola31378 +-SH belly button111455 +-SH breasts393182 +-SH busty sci-twi1391 +-SH busty twilight sparkle16486 +-SH clitoris42092 +-SH complete nudity7622 +-SH cute266965 +-SH dialogue94361 +-SH dirty talk818 +-SH dork4704 +-SH female1811975 +-SH glasses89343 +-SH glasses off570 +-SH high res408177 +-SH nipples243816 +-SH nudity515232 +-SH offscreen character52675 +-SH pubic hair10331 +-SH solo1432871 +-SH solo female235570 +-SH spread legs30688 +-SH spreading32044 +-SH talking to viewer5973 +-SH twilight sparkle is not amused2011 +-SH unamused24122 +-SH vaginal secretions53549 +-SH vulva191690
Loading...
Loading...
But the reduces the erotic degradation!
… Unless she wants me to give a thesis on the evolutionary and biological reasons why she, as a female, is sexually submissive? Start talking about mating habits?
Because being scientifically accurate is equivalent to dirty talk to Twilight. =P
She knows what dirty talk is, she just wants it to be scientifically accurate.
Edited
Dont bother I really dont care. I was just pointing out that what you said made literally no sense.
Dude, we were asked by the mods to drop this.
I’ll PM you later.
In real life, life has existed on Earth for 4.54 billion years.
You have had too many experiences where a girl was stating facts? Whut?
I mean, I was done with the topic, but thanks for the warning.
This seems to be some sort of personal discussion - please take it to PMs, and keep your comments on images apropos the image.
Sorry?
No… Is just that I like narrative consistency.
There was no pun, whether is cute or not is irrelevant and, in fact, most of what you said is irrelevant to what I said. Because all meant was that I like when a character is depicted consistently with its depiction in canon, nothing more, nothing less.
You are reading too much into it.
… Was there some pun I missed? Cuase I’m perfectly aware this is in-character for Sci-Twi. I just find this attitude in reality really condescending, and I have a hard time just dismissing that here even if I know I should.
Took you longer than expected… 😜
Edited