Uploaded by GOF
2000x1125 PNG 2.06 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Fluttershy presenting -SFMI hope you guys like it!
Part 2 (Anal): >>1489621s (merged)
Update: Higher resolution, fixed the lighting and shadows a bit
Newgrounds
Patreon
Please consider support me on Patreon
You can see there all my pictures and animations in HD [~4000px] with just one dollar per month.
Tags
+-SH explicit474372 +-SH artist:godoffury564 +-SH fluttershy259694 +-SH pegasus500459 +-SH pony1612331 +-SH g42040412 +-SH 3d123366 +-SH anatomically correct36038 +-SH anus138394 +-SH bedroom eyes82576 +-SH butt233024 +-SH clitoris42137 +-SH dock71786 +-SH eyelashes26955 +-SH female1812978 +-SH flutterbutt8319 +-SH heart clitoris1992 +-SH house3492 +-SH looking back87202 +-SH mare747735 +-SH nudity515529 +-SH outdoors22067 +-SH plot145232 +-SH ponut64493 +-SH ponyville7909 +-SH presenting34868 +-SH puffy vulva1894 +-SH raised tail25292 +-SH sexy46270 +-SH solo1433605 +-SH solo female235698 +-SH source filmmaker68058 +-SH tail103041 +-SH the ass was fat21189 +-SH vulva191899 +-SH vulvar winking18093 +-SH wallpaper20873 +-SH wallpaper for the fearless2022 +-SH wide hips30733 +-SH wings225286
Loading...
Loading...
What do you mean, they were always hot.
Professional grade quality that’s how.
Many people say negative things all the time here. I don’t feel that’s something that needs to be defended or documented. However, we do ask that people take meta conversations to the forums, and not use the comment threads on images for unrelated discussions.
Whether Rule #4 should or shouldn’t exist, or should or shouldn’t be changed, and whether people acting as vigilante moderators should be shut down, and whether Hebbocake’s posting history is the kind of thing that warrants additional moderation is unrelated to this image - There is nothing about this artist, or this image, that warrants using this particular comment thread as the “home” for a conversation like that.
So please create a thread to discuss this in the Site & Policy forum - not only will it be seen there by people looking for these kinds of conversations, it will spare this artist having their work used as a soapbox for unrelated drama.
That is not a denial.
If you say so.
The flaws with the models are easier to ignore when they’re not used for porn.
@Princess-Twilight
Yeah. Sure. That’s why nobody can say anything negative around here without being dogpiled by condescending comments about filters as if complaining is a thought crime and they are entitled to nothing but cheerful agreement. If your aim was not to create a hugbox you’ve done a fine job of it regardless. You have empowered the hugboxers and act as their enforcers. We can’t have real discussions any more because having a negative opinion automatically means you’re wrong.
Rule 4 was altered to be more in line with rule 0. Non-constructive criticism is what gets rule 4 comments deleted, not saying “I don’t like this”(although a comment like that adds nothing to the discussion, and isn’t really necessary), or stating why you don’t like something. If you say “this is shit, I don’t see how people like it” don’t be surprised to have your comment deleted.
“SFM models always have this off-putting plastic look.”
”not all SFM models are bad so why would I filter either tag? “
Just …
Meh, nevermind - this is pointless.
“People only say negative things because they want an excuse to complain.”
“Different opinions are my trigger!”
[bawwing intensifies]
Look, I can strawman with dumbass memes too.
You’re not just wrong, you’re lazy. If you bothered to look through godoffury’s gallery you’d know SFM models aren’t all they do. I like his other art and not all SFM models are bad so why would I filter either tag? So you don’t have to deal with seeing a negative opinion? You don’t belong on the internet if you can’t handle that.
“All who disagree with me are sheeps.”
“Muh constructive criticism.”
*Tips Fedora*
Joke aside, the guy is a goddamn SFM artist and you can’t stand SFM. By definition nothing he can do will ever please you. That’s why filters are probably a good idea.
You are as “constructive” as going to a classical concert and then complain to the musicians that classic music is shit - the hell do you want them to do with that feedback ? Quit their careers and switch to acrobatic dancing instead ? -_-
Edited
Would it blow your little mind if I told you I just have a different opinion, a criticism that I hope would benefit the artist?
Rule 4 was altered to create a hugbox by criminalizing dissent. All you sheep who come out of the woodwork to incessantly bleat about filters any time a negative opinion is posted show it’s working too well.
@kleptomage
I feel like you guys are too stubborn to do it because you WANT an excuse to complain and whine and cry about the things you hate. You guys are the reason Rule #4 exists.
@Scpx
@kleptomage
@Background Pony #E458
… you know you can filter stuff, right ? Not sure why you bother getting served images you know you won’t like - unless you just like to complain.
@Hebbocake
hat bothers me most is that the shine isn’t even consistent, some part, usually the genitals look much more smoother and shinier than the body.
Edited
Thanks! ^^
@GreyGears
I don’t know man, It would be awesome , but right now i don’t have the time to do that , maybe in the future??
It’s all about finding a good angle :P
Ever considered making VR-compatible version of your animations ? :D