Uploaded by FSin
838x436 PNG 28 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2193881 +-SH apple bloom60499 +-SH big macintosh33875 +-SH feather bangs644 +-SH fluttershy260727 +-SH rainbow dash282394 +-SH rarity219196 +-SH scootaloo59153 +-SH sugar belle3787 +-SH sweetie belle57144 +-SH equestria daily1336 +-SH fluttershy leans in495 +-SH forever filly609 +-SH g42049704 +-SH hard to say anything910 +-SH parental glideance1258 +-SH cutie mark crusaders22564 +-SH discussion in the comments823 +-SH text91042 +-SH text only4040
Loading...
Loading...
I used to hear it said that Dash’s dad was dead, except he showed up at the last moment in A heart’s warming tail, except it turned out that wasn’t Dash’s dad AT ALL. Just who the fuck is this pony!?!
Edited
Parent episode might also be interesting if they finally develop Dash’s parents and if it also involve Soarin.
Yeahm the least interestin out of these 4 is probably the Sweetie Belle episode. And the first 4 episodes sound very predictable and uninteresting, especially the Flurry Heart one.
r.i.p big mac
Or it will be like “Blue Cat Blues” from Tom and Jerry.
I feel that this will be Heart Hooves 2, only they believe that they are a thing (likely be misinterpreting scenes and taking them too far(coughfandomcough)) and try to help them instead of drug them.
MAYBE and POSSIBLE MORE THAN FRIENDS is enough for me as a confirmation. Vogel caused most of the shipping of them in the first place, I doubt he did it to just tease it shippers.
@Applepie1973
Being single is not necessarily the same thing as never having had a crush. No offense, just a clarification thing.
@kztxl7
I don’t recall Dash being an orphan ever being a thing. As far as I remember, it was always just the Apples and Scootaloo who had that as a prominent headcanon.
@thatguy
That would make it understandable if it was “first crush in a long time”, but there’s still a question of back when he was in school. (Unless he wasn’t in school as he grew up, but I don’t think they’d have him drop out of school on a show like this, regardless of the family situation. Might get misinterpreted.)
@Background Pony #4B6D
Humoring? No no no. What they were doing was screwing with the CMC’s heads to make them worry that they did permanent damage so they’d learn a lesson. Mean, but probably justified.
Asking staff at a con is most useless thing you could do to establish canon. Anything they can share, they will share on a panel, so Q&A after panel is pretty much futile. I’m not sure why they even keep doing those Q&A, they’re trying to be stand-up comedians or something?
And if Vogel gives some sort of joking non-answer, it’ll be proof of Fluttercord, he just couldn’t say anything because it would spoil a future episode, but if he confirms they’re just close friends, then he doesn’t know what he’s talking about because he’s involved in the movie not the show and besides that’s his opinion that is clearly wrong. Got it.
Im not. Illustrous Q already declared that he will ask Michael Vogel at Babscon about Discord and Fluttershy’s relationship and it will hopefully clear things up for neighsayers.
@Background Pony #27BA
@Darth Sonic
Very true, which is why I’m perfectly OK with this synopsis if McBelle ends up more serious than the fleeting, “gosh she’s cute” type of minor crush.
@Darth Sonic
Oddly enough, while I did have one (1) semi-serious crush as a teenager, I never had a celebrity crush. Unless you count my man-crush on Jim Henson.
People tend to ignore the stuff that went against their headcanon back then, and even now.
it was episode 5
Yeah, dude. Didn’t know she had a house back then.
Even though she clearly has a house
I’ve never thought of RD as an orphan. Maybe a homeless person cuz I’ve seen her sleeping on clouds but definitely not an orphan.
Not even a celebrity one?
33. Never a crush.
This. I mean, at last we will know how and who they are…
Fair enough I guess, it’s just that small, temporary crushes are a thing.
I think you misunderstood what he said. He stated that Rarity furrowing her brow doesn’t equate to her wanting to murder someone, similar to how blushing at someone or exchanging puppy love wouldn’t necessarily equate to a full on crush.
Yes, but there’s a range here, from “temporary Puppy Love” (which is what I think went down with Marble and Mac) and “full on sexual infatuation” which is what you seem to be implying when you compare it to Rarity wanting to murder people.