I actually agree with this. Flim and Flam suffered the correct penalties for they’re actions by being called out voluntarily and thus losing business. Anarcho Capatalism in action.

@SorryNeverSorry  
Yup,I think i can agree with that.

I would have put Filthy Rich in the bottom right.

@TexasUberAlles  

 
Yep. It simply doesn’t matter who has the power.

@Genevamode  
Marx for example defined Communism as the end-point of Socialism  
And then practical reality went and redefined it as “a great way to trick the poor and downtrodden into willingly exchanging one oppressor for another”.

@Background Pony #2916  

 
Depends on who you ask. Marx for example defined Communism as the end-point of Socialism.

@europus  
“Socialist” and “communist” aren’t antonyms and socialists aren’t communists-lite.

Rather be sittin just a gettin it  
Power to the people not the governments  
Capitalists,communists, terrorists  
Swear to god i dont know the difference  
Makin new slaves outta immigrants  
Wanna know where all that money went  
Another trillion spent by the goverment  
Here the bomb go, sent by the president  
-MKLVFKWR,Moby & Public Enemy (2004,Lyrics by Chuck D and Flavor Flav, music by Moby)

@europus  
Authoritarian Left  
The new buzzword term for them is actually clever: Ctrl-Left, to go with Alt-Right.

@Chronicle23  
It means being believing in a socialist economy but with libertarian social philosophy, its kind of the spectrum were utopianists & democratic socialists reside.
 
In my opinion its a self-contradicting pipe dream that will never exist in the real world without either going bankrupt or going full communist (Authoritarian Left).

@Genevamode
 
NAP is about not initiating force against another. That’s why it’s called the Non~~Aggression Principle, not the Non~~Violence Principle.
 
 
@Background Pony #2916
 
Anarcho-Capitalism is under the umbrella of libertarianism, and even so, the NAP is a libertarian principle in general.

@Mystic Beast  
NAP is Anarcho-Capitalist concepth, not libertarian one, and even so the boxes here are broad grouping of people who all fall into same two dichotomies, with “libertarian” here being not political and philosophical school of thought in USA but synonyms with “anti statist” and “decentralized”.
 
And yes, I am certified necromancer.

Inaccurate. Both sets on the bottom have violating the NAP as core character traits.
 
Left and Right don’t apply to libertarian thought.

@TexasUberAlles  

 
It doesn’t necessarily mean hitting/killing isn’t wrong just because it’s self-defence. It could be that libertarians think all violence is wrong, but sometimes a necessary evil.

@TexasUberAlles  
Just because something isn’t explained perfectly in an image doesn’t necessarily make it wrong.
 
Whether statist or libertarian, we’re only human after all.

@SonGokuMonkey  
Probably so, but that’s not what they ended up actually saying.

@TexasUberAlles  
I’m sure whoever made that image meant something to the effect of “don’t be the first to initiate force against others. Self-defense is OK.”

 
…Y’know, it kinda has a point.
 
@SonGokuMonkey  
The second proposition there is inherently self-contradictory; either hitting and killing are “ALWAYS wrong”, or hitting and killing are acceptable in self defense– both conditions cannot be true at the same time without ideological conflict.
 
The concept of self defense also extends to the nation-state as a whole– including The People as a whole, independent of any system of governance– in a war of existential defense, it’s just a matter of scale involving the concept of “defense of another”. If another nation is trying to destroy your nation, your soldiers are theoretically acting in defense of everyone, they’re just using better equipment than most people could bring to bear on their own behalf. The fact that politicians and generals and religious leaders as classes tend to have a persistent nasty habit of falsely claiming national self defense in order to fight unjustified wars of aggression doesn’t change the fact that sometimes international villains really are trying to wipe out other nations or other peoples.

Fun fact: libertarianism is a philosophy based on the Non-Aggression Principle.  

“@lettherebeponies”  
Nah I think discord represent its quite well.

“It’s madness!”
 
“It’s politics.”

Shit, now that I think about it, Zephyr Breeze would have made a better “Libertarian Left” stand-in than Discord does.

According to the last time I took the quiz, I am a Sombra.

@Background Pony #F910  

Libertarian means you more support the individual and their rights and freedoms whereas authoritarian is more Collectivist, good of the many. Could also be described as weak government vs stronger government.  
>T./pol/ish