Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Techy Cutie Pony Collection!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive191033 artist:tallyburd212 edit173219 maud pie14974 earth pony505437 anthro360471 g42033270 arm behind head10181 armpits46981 breasts392004 busty maud pie1501 clothes636110 female1806408 grammar error2225 high res407907 implied incest2093 low angle3767 panties63903 pun8952 solo1428809 solo female234903 stupid sexy maud pie147 sweater19627 thighs28389 thunder thighs16412 underwear79004 white underwear3974 wrong cutie mark1124
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #77B4
@Damaged  
Then what the heck is the object? “Daddy’s” isn’t the object. Hard is not a noun, it’s an adjective. So you’re either putting the adjective behind the object noun in a way that doesn’t make sense in english, or you’ve got a sentence where the object of the sentence is missing. Rock hard what? Rock hard daddies? And even in that situation, if the rock hard missing object belongs to daddy or multiple thereof, it would still either be “Daddy’s” or “Daddies’” because possessive apostrophe dangit.
Background Pony #77B4
@Damaged  
That should either be daddies’ with an apostrophe for a rock that belongs to multiple people, or a comma denoting separating those two clauses.