Uploaded by John Sheppard
2000x2000 PNG 1.6 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive191033 +-SH artist:tallyburd212 +-SH edit173219 +-SH maud pie14974 +-SH earth pony505437 +-SH anthro360471 +-SH g42033270 +-SH arm behind head10181 +-SH armpits46981 +-SH breasts392004 +-SH busty maud pie1501 +-SH clothes636110 +-SH female1806408 +-SH grammar error2225 +-SH high res407907 +-SH implied incest2093 +-SH low angle3767 +-SH panties63903 +-SH pun8952 +-SH solo1428809 +-SH solo female234903 +-SH stupid sexy maud pie147 +-SH sweater19627 +-SH thighs28389 +-SH thunder thighs16412 +-SH underwear79004 +-SH white underwear3974 +-SH wrong cutie mark1124
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Then what the heck is the object? “Daddy’s” isn’t the object. Hard is not a noun, it’s an adjective. So you’re either putting the adjective behind the object noun in a way that doesn’t make sense in english, or you’ve got a sentence where the object of the sentence is missing. Rock hard what? Rock hard daddies? And even in that situation, if the rock hard missing object belongs to daddy or multiple thereof, it would still either be “Daddy’s” or “Daddies’” because possessive apostrophe dangit.
Or it is going for word-play and using “rock” as an adjective.
That should either be daddies’ with an apostrophe for a rock that belongs to multiple people, or a comma denoting separating those two clauses.
“I love my daddies rock hard”
No, that’s entirely grammatically correct. She loves Daddy’s boulder hard. Whatever a boulder hard is.
Thanks?
That’s a Hell of an avatar ya got there, kid!