Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
No description provided.
Or make her a Kelpie in order to annoy people who don’t like the comic. XD
Siren battle carrier or assault sub.
One it’s clearly based on earth pony DNA witch means stronger body and healing witch probably are enhanced second the cannon is responding to her so it’s probably techno-arcana witch means some enchantment combined with cybernetics to fuse the pony and tank. Also there is no size refinance and said turn a solider in to a tank that means she could be a normal size pony or a giant build wrecker big enough to eat infinity.
I dare one of y’all to explain how two scientists destroyed the Earth conducting quantum experiments aboard an orbital space station and became the souls of a giant organic robot and a giant metal robot who both have humans and humanoids living on their giant robot corpses several centuries after they both killed each other. ;D
Which is common answer to any question asked of Gundam or Metal Gear or other mediums based on reality. X3
Yes, of coruse. Magic will solve it all. :D
Turret is too small for such cannon, it simply would not fit cannon’s breech. Where’s anti-infantry machinegun? In urban firefight this vehicle will live up to the first soldier with RPG-7.
BTW, even if sabot or HEAT shell will not pierce armor of this… erm… vehicle, pony inside it will recieve a serious injury. For example – heavy concussion, because her head right begind the upper frontal armor plate.
Oh, and I almost forgot. It’s have no bottom protection, that means even small IED will kill pony in an instant.
Edited
even running off of that logic, this also can vary widely via construction materials. Rolled homogeneous steel plating? Chobham Composite Armor? Depleted Uranium? Titanium? There’s many different answers, and all lead to a different outcome for how it’d work.
Besides, is this even really for a tank, or would this be a squad-based Infantry Support Vehicle, basically taking the role of heavy support for a group of troops in the immediate area - as in, not being sent out to combat other, more dedicated armor, but being able to tank the hits it may receive and provide a cannon and/or machine gun suppression to a hostile force?
Tell me where you’re getting these statistics from. I’d like to know how one can find out the armaments and defences of a fictional horse-tank.
Looks like we’ve got an Armored Warfare junkie over here….
The real T-14 Armata? It has the same side armor as the T-15 Armata AFV (because the Armata platform is a modular design, you literally can take a T-15 Armata Armored Fighting Vehicle and turn it into a T-14 Armata Main Battle Tank in 48 hours with the right parts to add [namely, the T-14 turret and fire-control systems], and a well-trained maintenance and repair crew). Because of this, and the fact that AFV’s need to have as little armor as possible in order to carry more troops and move faster, it means that the T-14 also has poor armor. The frontal glacis plates have more armor added, but the sides and rear are basically untouched from the T-15 AFV’s poor armor.
The VT-4, also known as the MBT3000, I don’t know enough about to say for sure.
The “M1A3”, or rather the XM1A3 (as there has been no tank in the U.S. Military to have been approved for distribution to the armed forces under that finalized designation yet), is still basically in pure flux, as there have been over fourty uniquely different tanks and modifications of the M1A1 and M1A2 to have recieved that designation. There has been a pretty steady form for what it would be that has been publicly known since 2009, but that design itself is still being near-constantly evaluated, modified, and re-tested.
Da. It is also good for batting politikal dissidents straight to goulag. Stalin approves. Send enough dissidents, and his undead hand will rise from the depths of hell to guide your shot to the target, like all good tankers need.
And most importantly, for as toothpick for removing kebab from uncle Statlin’s teeth
Plus, the ever-reliable Stalinwood Log. Because almost every Soviet/Russian tank since the T-34 has had a log added as standard equipment, for help traversing swampy terrain.
Unless its a Russian tank, then its just flatter, and also there’s this giant block of steel and a firewall back there… so all you do is immobilize the tank.
Most tanks have a fairly low amount of armour at their rear, compared to the front. Hence why flanking is seen as such a great tactic in all those war movies and such.