@BK_Leonidas  
I can’t refute that argument thus I suppress myself.

@NotMetaB  
Yeah I enjoyed Vegas as well. || Even though a good amount of it’s sound effects were ripped from and made me want to play Farcry: Instincts|| Well I mean both have somewhat similar themes but their play style and mechanics are much different. Counter-Strike is about reacting faster than your opponent can and keeping enough cash throughout the rounds to afford your go to loadouts. Rainbow Six: Siege is more Insurgency: Modern Infantry Combat where both sides need to utilize positioning and stance as well as whatever gear is available to their selected team and role to succeed.

@BK_Leonidas  
I meant the (mostly) one life, systematic terrorists vs. counter-terrorists format, but you’ve made a case for why Rainbow Six is its own beast, but I did mostly mean Siege. I enjoyed Vegas.

Ah the good old days of Rainbow Six. Where 90% of the game was spent kitting your squad and drawing out their every move.

@NotMetaB  
CS:GO doesn’t have iron sighting meaning you can consistently line up your shots and hit your mark without spending months studying the spread pattern of each gun to be good.
 
Wait you meant to compare how both series’ ended up disappointing in the later years didn’t you?

@Background Pony #77BA  
CSGO called, they want their premise back.

too bad the latest iterations don’t really live upto the name.
 
tbf, siege is a pretty good game though.

Pretty damn good.