General Tag Discussion
Background Pony #4DAB
I also think that an “objectionable” rating tag for content with strong political themes, rage bait, pedophilia, and other stuff along those lines would be a good idea, but I’m not so bold as to insist upon that. Tags that indicate objectionable content would be parented to it. The suggestive rating is among the spoilered tags in the default filter, and I don’t like the idea of a new user looking for something involving adults clicking on something with the “suggestive” spoiler, only to be jumpscared with something they don’t want to see.
I believe that the “foalcon” tag should be included under the hidden tag list in the site’s default filter, much like how content containing racial slurs is there.
My apologies if this is the wrong place to suggest a filter change. There doesn’t seem to be a specific thread for it.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #4DAB
The
The
foalcon
tag should not appear on safe images and any images with the tag would be hidden or spoilered by default already. And there is no way to universally assume what a new or inexperienced user would find objectionable to them or that they would not want to see something. Suggestive
is a tag about rating, not content. It could contain a crude joke as much as a busty chest in a swimsuit.I can tell you right now that what I don’t want to see is not at all shared by the majority opinion.
Background Pony #4DAB
@LightningBolt
That makes sense. Perhaps what I saw was not tagged correctly, then. I appreciate the response.
That makes sense. Perhaps what I saw was not tagged correctly, then. I appreciate the response.
JP
I miss the show so much
We need a non-meme tag for things that are under the bed. We have a literal
under the bed
tag but that’s actually a decade-old meme tag that has been misused for years (I just misused it myself a moment ago). Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
@JP
what a deeply fascinating set of images … looks like ‘stuck under the bed’ is in there, too. but also stuff like
what a deeply fascinating set of images … looks like ‘stuck under the bed’ is in there, too. but also stuff like
83 images - that’s not an impossible set to just fix today.
and
under the bed,meme
seems to do a good job of identifying the memes, and under the bed,-meme
seems like a reasonable ‘not meme’ set for that tag.And it seems that tag all started with this exploitable:
So … given how those tags are set up, especially
under the table
which seems like the ‘best’ of them, how about these changes to under the bed
:• remove the implications ‘meme’ and ‘exploitable meme’
• add the implications ‘bed’
• add the implications ‘bed’
fascinatingly, 58 of the
under the bed
images don’t have the bed
tag even though there’s a bed right there in the image … and then there’s stuff like >>605884 where I have no idea what under the bed
means on that image. Like, I’m zooming in super hard and I can’t see anything bed related in that image.Anyway, if we did that, then people looking for the meme version can look for
under the bed,meme
. And under the bed would just be under the bed.Looks like this might fix it … what do you think?
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
@saby
Also plausible but … not sure what the meme is that’s being identified. So, if that’s a thing that we need to identify, sure.
Also plausible but … not sure what the meme is that’s being identified. So, if that’s a thing that we need to identify, sure.
But I’m looking at stuff it’s used on, like this, and if that is tagged correctly then I have no idea now what the ‘under the bed’ meme even is, because it doesn’t seem to have anything to do with a bed or being under one.
JP
I miss the show so much
@Ciaran
AFAIK that image is part of some long-running “nested” meme, where each successive image contains the previous image. I think it’s this “series”. At some point, one of the actual “under the bed” image was part of the chain and so the tag is used even if the original image isn’t visible anymore, because people keep copying the tags without checking if they apply anymore.
AFAIK that image is part of some long-running “nested” meme, where each successive image contains the previous image. I think it’s this “series”. At some point, one of the actual “under the bed” image was part of the chain and so the tag is used even if the original image isn’t visible anymore, because people keep copying the tags without checking if they apply anymore.
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
Done. Added ‘exploitable meme, meme’ to all the images that were memes or referenced memes. So
under the bed,-meme
is now just ponies under beds, and it only implies bed. Background Pony #7C7A
@Ciaran
Thanks for the cleanup.
Thanks for the cleanup.
Some under the bed images are tagged meme and usually also exploitable meme but they don’t seem to be memes and especially not exploitable memes. Not sure if it’s because of the (no longer applied) automatic implications, or because they reference memes I’m not familiar with. Images in question:
Ciaran
Senior Moderator
君場森生きる
@Background Pony #7C7A
I think those are all ones that got hit by the old implications - please feel to remove
I think those are all ones that got hit by the old implications - please feel to remove
exploitable meme
and meme
from those if you’d like, and it seems appropriate. JP
I miss the show so much
@Background Pony #7C7A
That’s because up until a few hours ago, “under the bed” implied “meme” and “exploitable meme”.
That’s because up until a few hours ago, “under the bed” implied “meme” and “exploitable meme”.
I removed them from every image you linked to, plus a few others.
JP
I miss the show so much
species:pony
, species:unicorn
and species:earth pony
are used occasionally instead of pony
, unicorn
and earth pony
.Should they be aliased?
Or do we namespace all species tags?
Toastypk
Royal Advisor
I don’t wanna namespace those.
Those are sorta holdovers from how other sites sometimes do it.
Those are sorta holdovers from how other sites sometimes do it.
Background Pony #52BA
Other than when the © symbol appears in the image, or when the image addresses the concept of copyright (such as various protest images), what is the tag copyright used for? Or are those other cases using the tag wrong?
Background Pony #7C7A
@JP
They seem to be imports from another booru. I guess they can be aliased. Personally I don’t care whether the canonical form is namespaced or not. Also, aren’t unicorns, pegasi and earth ponies races rather than species?
They seem to be imports from another booru. I guess they can be aliased. Personally I don’t care whether the canonical form is namespaced or not. Also, aren’t unicorns, pegasi and earth ponies races rather than species?
@Background Pony #52BA
I suspect some incorrect uses are meant to express something like “original content, do not steal”.
I suspect some incorrect uses are meant to express something like “original content, do not steal”.
BTW we also have the underutilized but more specific copyright symbol tag.
Background Pony #B822
NSFW
On this image https://derpibooru.org/images/3116262, it has the
The short description of the sex tags says “sexual contact with genitals or anuses (even if not directly visible)”. That seems like a bit of a stretch to tag the image as
On this image https://derpibooru.org/images/3116262, it has the
sex
tag, which I have to question on why it is there.The short description of the sex tags says “sexual contact with genitals or anuses (even if not directly visible)”. That seems like a bit of a stretch to tag the image as
sex
even though the hands are not touching Fluttershy’s nether regions saby
Moderator
Anti Fun Officer
@Background Pony #B822
Following the report, I edited the tags, but turns out, even with mod powers, a locked tag cannot be edited in or out. Didn’t notice the non-imminent versions of sex and rape didn’t actually get removed. The lock has to be disabled first, then tags edited, then tags relocked. I fixed it now.
Following the report, I edited the tags, but turns out, even with mod powers, a locked tag cannot be edited in or out. Didn’t notice the non-imminent versions of sex and rape didn’t actually get removed. The lock has to be disabled first, then tags edited, then tags relocked. I fixed it now.
TPC132
Someone’s decided to use a bizarre amount of different tags to describe crying infants… across the diffent images I’ve found:
crying baby, crying infant, crying newborn, crying newborn baby, crying newborn infant, loudly crying baby, loudly crying infant, loudly crying newborn, loudly crying newborn baby, loudly crying newborn infant, fussing baby, fussing infant, fussing newborn, fussing newborn baby, fussing newborn infant, fussy baby, fussy infant, fussy newborn, fussy newborn baby, fussy newborn infant, screaming baby, screaming infant, screaming newborn, screaming newborn baby, and screaming newborn infant.
Putting aside how concerning this obsession with crying babies is, what should these even be condensed down to?
JP
I miss the show so much
@TPC132
Some (apparently) Russian uploaders have created dozens and dozens of spammy tags for “Fixies” or something like that.
Some (apparently) Russian uploaders have created dozens and dozens of spammy tags for “Fixies” or something like that.
I guess it’s the global “let’s create as many single-use tags on Derpibooru as possible” week.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!