Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Vecto, walking to reach Carrousel boutique, passed through a group of kids, not much younger then him.
When he heard, loud and clear “FATTY BLANKFLANK”.
He turned and sew a cute chubby little filly on the burst of tears, while a colt and another filly were bulling her.
When he heard, loud and clear “FATTY BLANKFLANK”.
He turned and sew a cute chubby little filly on the burst of tears, while a colt and another filly were bulling her.
Those kids are:
Diamond tiara x Strike : Glided Clock
Apple bloom x Pipsqueak :Sonya (a very large type of apple)
Silver spoon x Featherweight : Silk Shiner (she is Pegasus)
When you teach your kids that they are better then other, the cycle is never going to break.
I’ll make a good introduction on the 3 of them later.
Hope you enjoy!!!
It was supposed to say “that last post.” My bad
So, the bad blood just leaked over to the next generation, or DT and SS just taught their daughters whose children to make miserable? ;)
BTW, that last was mostly just me trying (and failing) to be witty.
Call me crazy, but I think it’s more being Apple Bloom’s spawn than her blankness that’s causing her trouble.
I mean, come on, it’s not like they’re hippogriffs or something.
Well…to be fair, it doesn’t take much to get some random stallion/colt to fuck either DT or Silver Spoon at the right time to make them pregnant. The surprised is as you stated, that the stallions stayed with the bitches…I get a weird forboding vibe though.
I can sorta see SilverWeight though—that could have been a photo shoot that turned to something much more…hmmm.
You picked the fight, though. You came in to an image related to a ship you don’t like (or consider ‘crack’) and started demanding answers. “Why is this a thing?” was what you said first, I believe, which is kind of a rude way of putting it. You then start talking down on other ships which no one else has mentioned up to this point (Fluttermac, to be specific). You have been the aggressor in all shipping discussion, talking down about ships and demanding people justify it. It doesn’t really matter how you go about your arguing when the only reason there is an argument is because you’re judging everyone else.
Doesn’t every shipper think that way? I mean, there are plenty of ships that I have no real strong feelings one way or the other, ones that I love, and others that I like and dislike. Yes, I can understand that some people ship the two standing next to each other, or sharing some sort of personality trait, or perhaps even their color schemes going well with one another. But that doesn’t mean that I like them. I use other ships as examples of how I perceive them as bad, and I follow up an argument as of why.
None of that was meant as a critique on the way you ship. It was, however, a bit of a critique on the way you argue. You’re far too one-sided, and your arguments carry a sense of ‘If I don’t think that way, no one should think that way’. You even didn’t contain your critique of other people’s shipping habits to relevant ships to the conversation, but also dragged in other ships on account of you don’t personally like them or how they came about. All I did was spell out the other side for you, since you seemed content to ignore anything that didn’t click with your own preconceptions.
If you don’t extrapolate, if you can’t see where behind-the-scenes interactions would happen, that’s fine. I honestly don’t care. My issue is when you get so caught up in that way of thinking, you ignore and argue against other ways of thinking, when I can’t see grounds for it other than they’re not the same as yours.
That’s dreadfully unimaginative, shipper or no.
I just prefer to work off of actual screen-time canon than speculation behind the scenes. Very few times do I look at two ponies and think they would work together despite never speaking to each other on screen and never seeing how they interact on the show rather than in my head.
Twilight Time.
I didn’t say anything about shipping. Just that Pip knows the CMC.
They’re probably together in gay orgies, but on opposite ends of the canvas. :T
I really don’t know that you’re being fair about this. Calling them crack shippings just because of minimal canon contact is a bit much, when it doesn’t even take much extrapolation to believe that there would be off-screen interactions - that in fact, it’d be stranger if there weren’t any interaction that we simply aren’t privy to - such as Fluttershy having spent time around her family-oriented friend’s brother, or any of the CMC being around a classmate.
In these cases, it’s extremely believable that there’s some form of behind-the-scenes relationship; shippers aren’t working off of nothing in those cases. Whether you choose to see them as acquaintances or friends, or look at more romantic possibilities, there is a reasonable base for it, regardless of what’s been physically shown. That is, there’s a certain amount of believability there that keeps it from being ‘crack’ shipping, which tends to delve much deeper into the absurd. Extrapolation does not make crack.
Also, I would likely consider something like Cadance/Chrysalis to be crack shipping. There was plenty of on-screen interaction between them, but the idea of them being a romantic pairing basically flies in the face of the reason laid out in the show - that is, an active contradiction that you can’t even extrapolate out of. I would also consider, say, Jet Set/Braeburn to be completely crack. It has no solid base and, in fact, challenges your sense, not even giving you something to extrapolate from - something like Fluttermac or Pipbloom don’t stick out as completely unreasonable in that way.
Shippers are a crazy lot that read something into nothing, it’s true. But we have more reason and logic then I feel you’re giving us credit for.
(That said, I totally want Jet Set/Braeburn now)
Which episode is this? I just marathoned the whole show.
Also, being in one episode is just as bad as shipping FlutterMac, who’ve only spoke once, Fluttershy AT (not to) Big Mac.
Nope. Never met.
No, because those characters aren’t OCs. We need the tags for OC offspring, because we don’t know who their parents are. But for canon characters, we know.
I’ll wager this question has been asked by others who’ve argued over this policy before BUT should we also include that for any twilight sparkle images? Add in her parents or rarity and sweetie belle their parents?
You’d tag the parents, offspring’s offspring, but tagging the grandparents is up to debate.
You say stupid argument again, I’ve never heard of this. And now next queston. If I make an OC kid of these OC kids do I then need to tag them and their parents? Or should we also tag Twilight’s parents in all twilight tags to know where she came from?
Who do we tag for Fluttershy?
Are we going to have this stupid arguement again?
They’re the kids of those two characters, so if you didn’t tag them, then you would have no idea whose kids they were.
Plus, that analogy doesn’t make any sense.
Well then it’s false advertising. It’s like if I asked for some chicken at a store and someone just handed me an egg. It makes no sense to just tag characters not in the image.
Well, if you’d bothered to read the Uploader Description, you’d note that this is a future-image based on child-producing couplings of canon characters. The one on the far right is meant to be Silver Spoon’s daughter. As with all offspring images, the parents are tagged.
Luna Eclipsed.