Uploaded by ManualReplica
3323x3500 PNG 4.5 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Alt cumless version in source.
Tags
+-SH explicit473292 +-SH artist:replica2208 +-SH oc950350 +-SH oc only690265 +-SH oc:bandaid102 +-SH oc:reppy851 +-SH anthro360844 +-SH plantigrade anthro51729 +-SH banppy31 +-SH belly button111157 +-SH big breasts126249 +-SH blushing275294 +-SH braces1852 +-SH breasts392443 +-SH broken condom144 +-SH bunk bed165 +-SH clothes636902 +-SH condom4276 +-SH condom on banana5 +-SH condom on penis639 +-SH cowgirl position10100 +-SH creampie45293 +-SH crotchless panties491 +-SH cum105756 +-SH cumming32139 +-SH eyes closed139444 +-SH feet54664 +-SH female1808724 +-SH glasses89157 +-SH hair bow25755 +-SH hairclip1872 +-SH high res407968 +-SH holding hands3940 +-SH male552667 +-SH moaning9477 +-SH monochrome175342 +-SH necktie11369 +-SH nipples243405 +-SH nudity514372 +-SH on back34324 +-SH open mouth238538 +-SH panties63956 +-SH penis214180 +-SH ripped panties32 +-SH ripped underwear49 +-SH see-through7539 +-SH sex172256 +-SH shirt40750 +-SH shock380 +-SH socks95933 +-SH straight179730 +-SH thigh highs59889 +-SH this will end in pregnancy2654 +-SH tight fit624 +-SH torn clothes6998 +-SH underwear79079 +-SH unwanted cumshot454 +-SH vaginal57700 +-SH vaginal secretions53440 +-SH vulva191188 +-SH wearing condom188 +-SH wide eyes19902
Loading...
Loading...
Oh, for that? I wasn’t being constructive.
I was literally just being confused. :s
No I mean like, if the point is to deliver such comments as a form of criticism for the artist, then it’s kind of moot when the picture is this old.
It’s kinda like going back to >>437623 and saying “wow what is wrong with this everything”.
There isn’t really a constructive of interesting purpose to it other than to kinda just poke fun at really old art. :p
This picture was originally posted in November of 2014.
I made my original comment three months ago in September. So back THEN, it was ten months old.
What I’m trying to say is, there really isn’t any limit on delivering a response; even if the original concerned commenters have long since lost interest, my question was questioning what I was seeing, so making the comment was my intention regardless, and I’m glad it was answered.
After all, it’s rarely a bad thing to get a notification and be reminded of an image as good as this one in its design!
I get nots from three-year-old images all the damn time. X3
Aside from what anon said
You do realize that this picture is over a year old, yes?
Huh… that’s a disturbingly low vaginal fold… at least, to me…
… But now I can see where you’re coming from; nice catch, there.
You are confusing the inside of her vagina with the actual condom itself. The condom reaches much lower, up until the black part at the bottom (Which is the actual penis).
It looks like it’s shooting out the bottom of the rubber, rather than from her vagina… so it looks more like he just bought the wrong size or something… as if trying to impress her with his “size” from that which was listed on the condom, forgetting the consequences for trying to buy too big a size and working with it.
Oh, yeah, that’d make sense. >w<
Maybe by the cum shooting out of her vago.