I think they’d just have a regular tag for their names, rather than an added tag for them to be ‘ponified’. Is more efficient that way, more so in this case.
@Background Pony #8D70
>Epona is a horse to begin with, there’s no reason for an extra tag for redundant information.
But… she’s not the only animal in existence. I was talking about stuff like other cartoon animals, Pokemon, mythology, etc.
Negative. I suppose the name is well enough.. Epona is a horse to begin with, there’s no reason for an extra tag for redundant information.
It’s like a tag that popped up as ‘unicorn twilight sparkle’ a while ago, there’s no point for adding redundant names or tags for redundant information, she’s a unicorn to begin with.
I think they’d just have a regular tag for their names, rather than an added tag for them to be ‘ponified’. Is more efficient that way, more so in this case.
i ship this
>Epona is a horse to begin with, there’s no reason for an extra tag for redundant information.
But… she’s not the only animal in existence. I was talking about stuff like other cartoon animals, Pokemon, mythology, etc.
Negative. I suppose the name is well enough.. Epona is a horse to begin with, there’s no reason for an extra tag for redundant information.
It’s like a tag that popped up as ‘unicorn twilight sparkle’ a while ago, there’s no point for adding redundant names or tags for redundant information, she’s a unicorn to begin with.
“My Epona can’t be this cute”
A reference of Oreimo.
You’re welcome.