Why does this have the adoracreepy and not creepy tags? What is it that suggests even a hint if creepy?

@Blossomforth  
I see. I was just throwing out an idea because I know it’s really tedious to manually fix the tags on a large number of images.

@kleptomage
 
How it works is when a tag is added to an image (either when the image is being created, or the tags updated), the system just checks to see if that tag has any implications, and also applies them. There’s nothing in place to “back-imply” tags to images that already have that tag.
 
It probably wouldn’t be desirable either, as implications are not always 100% accurate, and it’s intended that people be able to remove the implied tags anyway. For example, “TwiDash” implies both of those ponies, but in reality, there’s plenty of images that only feature one of them, and the ship is just hinted at.

@Blossomforth  

 
I noticed discrepancies between the numbers of some tags and their implications and I figured that was the cause. You’re right of course about the race implications but there has to be a solution to implications not applying to previously set tags. Maybe if the tag field of every image could be made to refresh?

@kleptomage  

 
^this
 
Also, implications only apply to tags set after the implication was added, it won’t go back and add the implied tag to previously uploaded/tagged images.
 
Additionally, there’s always the issue of humanized/EQG/hornless anthro Rarity, for example, there’s plenty of images of her that the “unicorn” tag would not be appropriate. We don’t like adding implications that only fit 50% of the time, because then that’s a lot of tag removing that has to be done.

@aerion111  
You can ask the admins to set up race implications for every single character that has ever appeared on the show but I’ll tell you right now they won’t do it.

@kleptomage  

 
I keep forgetting to check the date, and that I do apologize for - sometimes the tags gives so few pictures it ‘looks’ new just by virtue of being on the first few pages (I suspect I was checking ‘adoracreepy’, though it might just have been rarilight+cute)
 
But I’d actually argue I shouldn’t have to; This site’s got a system of ‘implied’ tags.  
If the admins set it to ‘imply’ the race of the known show-characters, as long as they can prevent it from applying to species-bent versions, it’d make it easier to do the stuff I said.

@aerion111  
Since you have nothing better to do than pick an argument with a year old comment, why don’t you go tag every earth pony as earth pony, every pegasus as pegasus, every unicorn as unicorn, and every alicorn as alicorn?

@kleptomage  

 
How is ‘unicorn’ pointless?  
I’d pretty much never use it myself, but if we’re going to have a Unicorn tag, how is this not appropriate?  
Yes, Rarity is by default a Unicorn, but there are non-Rarity Unicorns - so, if you hate unicorns, this is probably one of many pictures you’d want to be able to filter out.  
Or filter in, if you love unicorns.

Adorable!  
They aren’t quite hoofie pjs though without the hoofie booties part though

Well, not on you.

Dawwww, even if as others have pointed out it could be taken a “I wear your skin like a suit”-ish

The “solo female” tag is for erotic art and tagging Rarity with “unicorn” is useless. Tags fixed.

@Taupe_Hat  
I already made that comment, son. You’re three minutes late. :P

Well, I’ve never seen hoofie/footie pajamas modeled after an immediate friend.

Not creepy ones.

Don’t the footy pajamas usually cover your whole foot