Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
The Travelling Pony Museum Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

I’m sorry.

suggestive190938 edit173192 edited screencap90571 screencap295954 apple bloom60111 scootaloo58825 sweetie belle56814 earth pony489519 pegasus497542 pony1605026 unicorn538996 appleoosa's most wanted836 g42031685 grannies gone wild921 cutie mark crusaders22418 exploitable meme33733 female1805457 filly97524 google395 meme93961 what are the crusaders screaming at6
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Scrounge
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Since the Beginning  -

nobody's favorite
Nothing about the questions had a hostile tone to it.
 
Most people respond to “It was a joke” with either “Oh” or “ I don’t get it” rather than demanding an explanation for why it wasn’t properly marked for them. Then when I do try to explain where I’m coming from, as you’ve demanded, you argue with me about that. There’s enough people in the world that not everybody’s gonna understand everybody 100% of the time. But you’re seriously coming at me like I’ve wronged you personally and/or I owe you something, and it’s getting old. Not that I expect you’d be able (or willing) to imagine how demanding you might theoretically seem to someone on the other side of this, but I needed to vent.
 
@FlutterButterButt  
If someone’s responding to a post, you should generally read the post they’re responding to before you respond to theirs. Don’t intentionally ignore context and then complain about not having any.
Firstly, i never said or implied anything about intentionally not knowing. That was a poor strawman, and secondly, Are you implying you were responding to this image post?
 
I was referring to this post by TexasUberAlles. And these are your exact words (emphasis mine).
 
@FlutterButterButt  
The tone and way you wrote your comment sounded like a “well actually” type of comment, especially for someone who hasnt seen the one you responded to.
 
That sure looks a lot like “I didn’t read what you were responding to” to me.
 
@FlutterButterButt  
“Barely regal” is that some inside sexual joke im not in on?
 
Yes. It’s a pun on “barely legal”, which refers to adult materials involving a woman who is above the age of consent but not by much. But I didn’t think I should specify that, since the only person I know of who can reliably make footnotes entertaining was the late Terry Pratchett.
 
I try to make someone laugh, and I get this. I don’t know why I bother.
FlutterButterButt

Ok buddy
The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
 
In this case they were. Nothing about the questions had a hostile tone to it.
 
If someone’s responding to a post, you should generally read the post they’re responding to before you respond to theirs. Don’t intentionally ignore context and then complain about not having any.
Firstly, i never said or implied anything about intentionally not knowing. That was a poor strawman, and secondly, Are you implying you were responding to this image post? In that case of course ive seen it, but its very hard to figure out what youre reffering to here since you keep playing the pronoun game instead of just being specific. Thirdly, i get that its a joke now, but what exactly seperates your comment from someone who posts info about a leaked episode? You literally worded it like you were being dead serious. If you cant tell if its a joke or not, how is that even a good joke? Its like if someone says something sarcastic, but you cant tell if theyre being sarcastic or not because they could have been 100% serious.
 
Was the title supposed to give it away, or the description? What is the suggestive implication? “Barely regal” is that some inside sexual joke im not in on? And an episode where Twilight, ember, and Thorax confront thier issues with leadership is a totally legitemate concept, so that cant be it. I really dont get it
Scrounge
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Since the Beginning  -

nobody's favorite
especially for someone who hasnt seen the one you responded to.
 
Well, there’s your problem.
 
If someone’s responding to a post, you should generally read the post they’re responding to before you respond to theirs. Don’t intentionally ignore context and then complain about not having any.
 
I am not being hostile, i am simply asking you questions.
 
The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
FlutterButterButt

Ok buddy
@FlutterButterButt
there was the utter implausibility of some random guy dropping unmarked season 9 spoilers in the comments for some random image.
 
For someone who has been here for 6 years you sure have been lucky with spoilers. Half of season 8 was spoiled to me on derpibooru, and half of those were comments. The tone and way you wrote your comment sounded like a “well actually” type of comment, especially for someone who hasnt seen the one you responded to. I am not being hostile, i am simply asking you questions.
Scrounge
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Since the Beginning  -

nobody's favorite
@FlutterButterButt  
It was a response to another joke post, the image itself is a joke about an episode having a name with less than family-friendly implications and thus an appropriate place for a risque pun, there was the whole setup-and-punchline structure, and there was the utter implausibility of some random guy dropping unmarked season 9 spoilers in the comments for some random image. I don’t know what else I was supposed to do or why you’re being so hostile about it.