Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
The beginning of ancap.
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
heh, okay
It wouldn’t be quite right to retaliate against a collective based on the actions of an individual. Your guilty by association farce excuse is a direct violation thereof rule. The chink in your armour is the fact that ancap is an individualist ideology, thus individual aggression is dealt by individual retaliation. Freedom from association. But, whatever. I’m not even a bloody anarachist!
lichtenstein? nah man it conservative liberal
also yes, that is the basic lmao
So then just nuke yourself nigga lmao, this is basic “How to form a Lichtenstein-Somali hybrid Anarcho-Monarchist paradise.”
Also your statist boner is showing.
“The non-aggression principle (or NAP; also called the non-aggression axiom, the anti-coercion, zero aggression principle or non-initiation of force) is an ethical stance which asserts that “aggression” is inherently illegitimate. “Aggression”, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as initiating or threatening the use of any and all forcible interference with an individual or individual’s property”
so, by bombing leftists and ‘other cucks’ you also violated those individual’s property, their shirt, and body, you know, personal property
That would violate the NAP, dildo.
oh, nukes! so anarchist! now can i bomb the libertarian party since its for self-defence?
i’m half-gay so thanks
no u
you mean gay right?