She defended Starlight by saying “she hasn’t enslaved anyone lately” without even being sure she’s actually reformed. She hinted to Starlight that with the right stone, she could rule all of Equestria, and said “Am I?” when Starlight asked her if she was messing with her.
She kicked reality just THAT hard. Like Superboy Prime.
It is Starlight’s choice how this given knowledge is used, not Maud’s.
So, Maud is more like ‘true neutral’.
Edited
Thing about Maud’s delivery is that you wouldn’t know how she felt because she’d say it the same way no matter what. The line delivery doesn’t really mean she doesn’t care.
I’m only being half serious. I doubt the writers would do this, even if it would be fantastic.
IS SHHHHEEEE?????
I don’t know if that’s the deciding factor. Lex Luthor also believes the world would be better off under his thumb.
Edited
Any scenario where a character has malicious intent but does not contribute to the protagonist’s main struggle. Hans and the Duke of Weselton from “Frozen” would be examples of this.
That’s kind of ambiguous. Brain genuinely believes the world would be better off under his thumb (compared to the more actively malevolent Snowball, for instance), so it’s hard to truly classify him as a villain.
Invader Zim would be a better example.
Edited
@Dogman15
Pinky and the Brain! As the main characters who the story follows, they’re our protagonists, but their goal is to take over the world, so they’re the villains, aren’t they?
Edited
Edited
When has someone been a villain but not an antagonist?
Either that or Holder’s Boulder hatching will become the season finale global threat.
Seriously though, I’m not fond of the slight change in the look in the eye of that cherry CM pony behind them when Maud mentioned it… it’s like she just heard something that piqued her interest…
Nothing…but rocks.
>>1032531p (merged)