@Background Pony #6A81  
Black and white.  
Two extremes.

@SeraphimDawn  
Black or white, you mean?

@Beau Skunky  
That mode of “thinking” is black and white.

@Beau Skunky  
I agree with you completely. I hate people who give what group they proclaim themselves as a shitty name, eg. KKK(Christian), ISIS(Iranian/Islam), that guy, Hitler(The good people of Germany), The leader of the USSR(Russians), etc. And those are just examples people know.

@Background Pony #C3B5  
the timing and points given out by comic makes it too much of a coincidence to assume that it’s based on alvrexadpot.
 
i wonder if people would call BS if law and order made an episode out of this.

@OptimusPrimevil  
I guess so.  
Even though that can’t really be pinned down to a single individual, like Catfood here who brings up to us this fantastically inflammatory topic with colorful, enraged equines.

@Background Pony #C3B5  
shouldn’t the thanks be given to the inspiration for all this?

>This comment thread
 
>Thank you based Catfood.

@Niggoslav_Krawczyk  
>goy  
NK pls

@Background Pony #6A81  
I just generated a random 4-digit hexadecimal number: de6f. Is there a mod who would like to change his username to “Background Pony #de6f” so he can truthfully say he had no say in his handle?

@The Frowning Pony  
I never called them bloodthirsty murderous retrogrades. Today is the first time I’ve ever heard the word “retrograde.”
 
I did, however, accuse them of revering a child rapist, based on the fact that the prophet they all revere raped a child. Her name was Aisha, and she was nine years old.
 
In fairness, I probably could have phrased things a little more delicately on a safe image, but it still struck me as a little unreasonable that I got banned for making a truthful statement that a mod didn’t like.
 
As for my other bans… yeah, I probably deserved those.

@Ridley Wolf Totally innocent bystander and all-around good goy here, can confirm!  

@Ridley Wolf  
@Archonix  
@TheLoneLampman
 
What a surprise that another “mods banned me for disagreeing!” assertion chooses to omit the little ”and acusing millions of being bloodthirsty murderous retrogrades that revere child rapists” detail.

@Ridley Wolf  
Not seeing anything like that.

@Ridley Wolf
 
I had a look.
 
No you didn’t.

@Background Pony #6A81  
Actually, I got a “You’re wrong, shut up” ban once.
 
So it does happen.

@Niggoslav_Krawczyk  
That joke is bad, and you should feel bad.
 
 
@Beau Skunky  
Actually, that little number is ensuring consistency of numbers within comments. That way you can’t … paper bag puppet? Is it suck puppeting if its a bunch of untraceable posts? Unnumbered BP posts had me posting “I’m that dude” a hundred billion times before they were added.
 
@Archonix  
But people being wrong and inventing reasons to be angry and insult others is really relevant to everything!
 
Also, I never understood why people think you guys ban for that sort of thing. Bans for dumb or wrong reasons happen all the time, but I can’t recall a single “your political views are wrong, so shut up” ban.
 
 
@Background Pony #6E74  
Because a random string you generate is still something you generate. I cannot say I had no say in my identification if the first step is generate what I’m identifying with, That’s just silly.

@TheDog  
>>TheDog  
>>sadcat  
Zounds…Something is amiss!  

@Background Pony #6E74  
Indeed. I’m not sure who added the tag a second time, though.  
It already served its purpose.

@The Frowning Pony  
Ban me in the face! Not the arm, not the spine! FACE! (J/K)
 
I’m suddenly reminded of that hilarious “Face McShooty” anon’ who kept begging to be banned. >>663468
 
@Background Pony #6E74  
The whole point to the numbers changing on anon’ names on each pic separately is to hide people’s identity.

@Background Pony #6A81  
But if you have a constant BP number across the site, that’s the same as having a name, even if the number isn’t one you chose yourself. Thus, if it’s the choosing that upsets you, it’s easy enough to generate a random string for a name. So either there’s something else going on, or you’re being inconsistent.
 
@Ridley Wolf  
I’m guessing someone else has checked the tag edits, then?

@TheDog  
I’m sure I can find a reason >:[

@The Frowning Pony
 
What did I do?!
 

@Archonix  
OR WE’LL BAN YOU AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOO.

@Keith Mowz
 
Despite what some people may continue to insist, we don’t ban people merely for disagreeing with the mods or for holding contrary opinions.
 
Now it’s probably time to let this conversation end as it’s really nothing to do with the picture at all.