Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Source
not provided yet
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
No description provided.
Because she is a mammal.
Look at the body language of the two pairs, and the color of the sky in the background. It’s pretty much a propaganda picture, like the Manifest Destiny painting:
Why does she have hideous batwings for?
“does this artist at least know how to hold a pen? I think my eyes are bleeding now”
Pardon me for saying this bluntly, but you just sound like an enormous shithead when you say things like that in seriousness. He did a lot more right than he did wrong.
The perspective on the front of the tank is really odd given the way it meets with the ground, as is the perspective on the wheels, and both could use a lot more detail. The sky and trees in the very background could use more attention. The expression on the blue pony is awkward looking. Those are the major flaws; other than that everything else is fine. The lighting and coloring is rather well done.
No, I’m not being ironic, it seems he really took about 11 hours or more to finish this pic and during all this time he hasn’t noticed the inaccurate on that vehicle, if I was going to guess, it seems he was trying to draw the tank as the viewer was looking at it from below and this is why it looks so messed up and as I said, for someone who want to be a professional artist, that’s a shame.
Well TBH I kinda new the B17 was off… But I was interested to see what One actually looked like… And I have to say I think the OA kinda nailed it. Like I said its not a IRL B17. But again “I didn’t think (in hindsight), that the OA was shooting for IRL Art.” So as they are in this Pic I think they work as they are.
I mean, I agree, the B-17 could use some work and is inaccurate (I don’t know anything about tanks), but it doesn’t ruin the picture. It’s like you guys are bitching about it so that you can show how much you know about WW2 vehicles instead of giving it an honest critique. This is far from a bad picture aside from the inaccuracies. It just doesn’t look like this artist does vehicles/machinery that often.
@Background Pony #4967
You’re being ironic, right? Poe’s Law obligates me to ask.
Well given a certain latitude of “caricature” I have to step back from, my initial criticism. No its not Real-World Accurate. And, I’m starting to think that the Artist drew these as mere caricatures of the real thing(s), and not the real things per-say.
Yeah, the artist wasn’t paying a whole lot of attention to any actual reference source to muss up two iconic WW2 vehicles like that.
>Implying that, that B-17 is any better… Top-Side Turrets don’t work like that. Neither so the Nose Turret, for that matter…