Its not even that hard. There are literally image generators that do all of that work for you. Give it a picture, it automatically converts the image, as shown by the first BP’s examples.
@bunda
nope.
it was already cleared of its original image, it was merely a template, all the guy needed to do was reduce the resolution to that of the appropriate brick width/heigh, then stretch that (without upscale blending), apply multiply layer mode and just mask the areas that aren’t bricks.
To me the largest piece of evidence that it’s fake is the colour of the brick he’s holding, that and the visible edges of the bricks that are places aren’t actually the colour of their tops.
@Background Pony #0A35
Maybe he takes a picture in the exact same pose, with the exact same piece at the exact same level to completion…and never moves his stuff.
@Background Pony #2D46
Its not even that hard. There are literally image generators that do all of that work for you. Give it a picture, it automatically converts the image, as shown by the first BP’s examples.
nope.
it was already cleared of its original image, it was merely a template, all the guy needed to do was reduce the resolution to that of the appropriate brick width/heigh, then stretch that (without upscale blending), apply multiply layer mode and just mask the areas that aren’t bricks.
Maybe he takes a picture in the exact same pose, with the exact same piece at the exact same level to completion…and never moves his stuff.
Proof?
How’s this?
Or this?
Does this look familiar to you?
Are you satisfied?
It’s some lame exploitable.
Everything from C-E is bullshit.