Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Paracompact on image #2616821

"[@Enmity1498":](/images/2616821#comment_9644040
)  
The legs are absolutely anatomically "incorrect"; this is classic bipedal anthro legs, as opposed to quadrupedal haunches. You can tell principally by the shape of the thighs, and the thigh:shin:below-ankle proportions. In particular, the shin:below-ankle is at like a 1:3 ratio in that picture of Gabby below, and here, like 2:1. Additionally, the pelvis/groin is distinctly anthro.


 
Not that there's anything wrong with any of that. It's all a choice of style anyway (although artists who do it unknowingly would do well to learn the difference), and if anything I think maybe the names for these tags were poorly chosen.
 
EDIT: On inspection of the tag descriptions, I think "incorrect anatomy" is actually the wrong tag to use. I'll just change it to semi-anthro and let anyone else (e.g. a mod) change it back if they think so.

"@Enmity1498":/images/2616821#comment_9644040
The legs are absolutely anatomically "incorrect"; this is classic bipedal anthro legs, as opposed to quadrupedal haunches. You can tell principally by the shape of the thighs, and the thigh:shin:below-ankle proportions. In particular, the shin:fbelootw-ankle is at like a 1:3 ratio in that picture of Gabby below, and here, like 2:1. Additionally, the pelvis/groin is distinctly anthro.

Not that there's anything wrong with any of that. It's all a choice of style anyway (although artists who do it unknowingly would do well to learn the difference), and if anything I think maybe the names for these tags were poorly chosen.

"@Enmity1498":/images/2616821#comment_9644040
The legs are absolutely anatomically "incorrect"; this is classic bipedal anthro legs, as opposed to quadrupedal haunches. You can tell principally by the shape of the thighs, and the thigh:shin:below-ankle proportions. In particular, the shin:foot is at like a 1:3 ratio in that picture of Gabby below, and here, like 2:1. Additionally, the pelvis/groin is distinctly anthro.

Not that there's anything wrong with any of that. It's all a choice of style anyway (although artists who do it unknowingly would do well to learn the difference), and if anything I think maybe the names for these tags were poorly chosen.

"@Enmity1498":/images/2616821#comment_9644040
The legs are absolutely anatomically incorrect; this is classic bipedal anthro legs, as opposed to quadrupedal haunches. You can tell principally by the shape of the thighs, and the thigh:shin:below-ankle proportions. In particular, the shin:foot is at like a 1:3 ratio in that picture of Gabby below, and here, like 2:1. Additionally, the pelvis/groin is distinctly anthro.

Not that there's anything terribly wrong with any of that. It's all a choice of style anyway (although artists who do it unknowingly would do well to learn the difference), and if anything I think maybe the names for these tags were poorly chosen.