Uploaded by dt
1280x1280 JPG 263 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH explicit499859 +-SH artist:atryl2302 +-SH artist:marble-soda386 +-SH oc996240 +-SH oc only729416 +-SH oc:cream heart3097 +-SH pony1696050 +-SH ahegao36228 +-SH anus147375 +-SH butt249038 +-SH butt focus2312 +-SH close-up9500 +-SH creambutt610 +-SH dock77676 +-SH female1905038 +-SH human vulva on pony10851 +-SH labia2167 +-SH looking at you282063 +-SH looking back94379 +-SH looking back at you33541 +-SH mare803525 +-SH milf14206 +-SH nudity543694 +-SH plot154735 +-SH presenting37798 +-SH solo1502865 +-SH solo female247210 +-SH tongue out156623 +-SH vulva207955
Loading...
Loading...
It still looks weird.
Smartass I am, thank you.
Theres a difference between identical and similar, smartass.
So are you telling me they don’t look identical at all? Are you telling me that they have no similar features at all? I think you should look how dense you’re being. You’re trying to defend the fact that it’s not a duplication even though it’s too similar to be called original, you even ignored that fact that the signature genitalia is being duplicated, and he also wrote his signature in the bottom corner like he drew it originally.
“obviously identical” If only I had a reaction image for how dense you are being.
Do you even know what image this is a ‘trace’ of? Look at both of them side by side and tell me this is ‘OBVIOUSLY IDENTICAL’ again.
I agree for that matter it’s not rightful to claim or copyright a pose or position that can be used very commonly. If the artist was wrong, he was not wrong by using the same expression and pose, but he was wrong by calling an obviously identical image his art.
Thank you for implying I said that using the same pose and expression means tracing. I was suggesting that he could have probably traced or recolored the previous atryl image because of how identical it looked. I have never said it was a definite trace because of the same pose and expression, but was questioning it could be because of the very identical genitalia drawings. Emphasis on the some-what.
Your point is? He was reinforcing the point THAT I MYSELF tried to make.
and look at the image the artist supposedly ‘traced’ the only thing they have in comment in the pose and expression the pony has.
If using the same pose another artist used in a previous drawing was tracing, then you must have a really fucked up definition of a trace.
I love atryl to death but greenjack’s right, he cant own a common pose.
Why the hell are you complaining about a 23 day old comment? It’s somewhat traced or uses a symbolism of atryl’s art (the genitalia for an example), but it’s forgivable about how well done the coloring and tracing was done.
Exactly, thank you.
“I’d suggest coming up with your own poses and whole pictures-” yes, because this pose totally hasn’t been in the pornography industry since the dawn of porn. honestly, all your comment sounds like to me is a passive agressive way for you to say “stop using my art for inspiration or I’ll send my horde of rabid fanboys after you.” seriously, how would you like it if some people started saying “your art looks like you traced over someone else’s art or a photograph and altered the lineart a bit.”? what would be your reaction? would you sit there and take it while a crowd called you a fraud purely because they dont’ know the difference between copying a pose and full on tracing?
you might be a good artist, but you’re not a god. you don’t have the authority to trademark a pose.
same pose, but with as many differences in the lineart I can see between them it’d be easier to redraw it from scratch than to trace it.
Lmao WOW
Did you even read what i said? You’re confusing me…
facepalm check what trace is :)
Neither do I.
Even if he copied the the position and expression, its not like atryl invented it, he could have never heard of atryl before drawing this. Before people start bitching at me, the keywords are COULD and IF