“*Disclaimer: I do not claim to be an expert on this and everybody has their own way of drawing their ponies and thats okay!
Just something silly I wanted to draw to address a very real issue though dont take it too seriously!”
Loading...
Loading...
I dunno. So long as they still have the same personality and behavioral traits it doesn’t matter much what they look like.
My issue is that I don’t think it’s important to make them any more realistic than the show does (appropriate amount of horse and anthro, balanced).
That goes for horse dicks too!
This is just a bit too close to bestiality for my tastes.
If you don’t think the guide is necessary, then just don’t use it…?
I mean the artist that drew this said this in its description, “everybody has their own way of drawing their ponies and that’s okay!”
Thank you for the concern nonetheless.
But making ponies too “lifelike” has its own set of drawbacks; there’s a tendency for them to start looking like dogs in terms of the barrel/leg shape compared to the head size. This makes them look too much like talking pets which is more disturbing/depraved in a rule 34 context.
The show’s style anthro’d them in a unique way to avoid this look; the leg shapes flare and are thicker than they need to be, the torso and thighs are “fatter” which make them more humanoid (both of these changes make it possible to make them cartoon-bipedal at times without it looking impossible).
So do the genetalia need to be so accurate? And I’m pretty sure they don’t go into heat (based on observed family units).
Although crotchtit advise is sound, they are quadrupeds, and it would be weird otherwise.
Now I’m a little more enlightened about the marvelous capacity of adaptation of the human mind.
Nothing to be perturbed about there, Mr Samer; equine bits are quite the glorious site to behold.
Well, if you insist.
Also
CHESTICLES