Chopsticks 
"[@Background Pony #2569":](/images/2631321#comment_9672203
)
I know I'm in a very unpopular minority here, so it's not really a complaint I feel is legitimate, just a personal pet peeve of mine, and even then just a little. Enough I'm willing to make fun of myself for it.
In moments where the angle is particularly reflective for the whole of the picture for effect (i.e. 3/4 walking in on a scene), fine. But the artist seems to enjoy finding excuses to have the plot of a female character,_***extremely often*_**, facing the viewer, where it serves very little purpose except to expose us to see it.
It's just the nature of the comic series itself, but one case-in-point:
>>2415114s
The comic is introduced with us seeing RD's plot, not Soarin's, just RD's. And Soarin' is specifically implied mentioning it as part of "enjoying the view". Throughout the series, the only instance you see a male's plot he's wearing pants and the fine detail crack isn't there.
Also, I try to spoil the tag "the ass was fat" because it's generally used showing a gross, heaving, barely-past-explicit images of a butt in the face of the viewer or a thong or something, and people won't quit adding the tag to images (like this one) that are generally ok or ok-ish, and it's a little aggravating on what content I seem to miss out on. (I managed to see this pic before the tag was added).
On top of this, the artist follows the trend of drawing a full-on butt crack from every angle, which is in of itself, unnecessarily added detail. Even so, realistically speaking, most of the time this crack line wouldn't be visible because the tail would cover it, but the artist also follows the same trend with the tail curling up and around to give readers a view of most or all the full plot.
I demonstrate what I'm talking about here:
>>1359118s
Rice pone
I know I'm in a very unpopular minority here, so it's not really a complaint I feel is legitimate, just a personal pet peeve of mine, and even then just a little. Enough I'm willing to make fun of myself for it.
In moments where the angle is particularly reflective for the whole of the picture for effect (i.e. 3/4 walking in on a scene), fine. But the artist seems to enjoy finding excuses to have the plot of a female character,
It's just the nature of the comic series itself, but one case-in-point:
>>2415114s
The comic is introduced with us seeing RD's plot, not Soarin's, just RD's. And Soarin' is specifically implied mentioning it as part of "enjoying the view". Throughout the series, the only instance you see a male's plot he's wearing pants and the fine detail crack isn't there.
Also, I try to spoil the tag "the ass was fat" because it's generally used showing a gross, heaving, barely-past-explicit images of a butt in the face of the viewer or a thong or something, and people won't quit adding the tag to images (like this one) that are generally ok or ok-ish, and it's a little aggravating on what content I seem to miss out on. (I managed to see this pic before the tag was added).
On top of this, the artist follows the trend of drawing a full-on butt crack from every angle, which is in of itself, unnecessarily added detail. Even so, realistically speaking, most of the time this crack line wouldn't be visible because the tail would cover it, but the artist also follows the same trend with the tail curling up and around to give readers a view of most or all the full plot.
I demonstrate what I'm talking about here:
>>1359118s