Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Incursor on image #2291333

Incursor

"[@Hollowfox Jaeger":](/images/2291333#comment_8856232
)  
1. The G5 movie isn't live action, which is what you seem to be implying by comparing it to those.


 
2. Just because it's not G4 doesn't mean it will be bad. Good reboots exist. G5 could have everything that made G5 good and use the lessons from there to improve upon it. G4 surprised us with it's quality and we've seen nothing of G5 to suggest it will do what you are accusing it of.


 
3. The reason for the writing shortcomings in The Movie was due to: 1. being written midway thought the series meant it lacked much of the continuity and character development that made the series good. 2. It was confined to the limitations and cliches of the series and genre without what made the series successful despite that. A reboot would would fix that by being freed of those issues.


 
Good writing doesn't magically happen, if you're certain a sequel can fix it please give specific examples as to how. When fans complained about easy redemptions, Cozy's non-redemption caused complains as unfair given said prior redemptions. That's an example of how the baggage of G4 held it back from improving like you say a sequel would.


 
4. I do like G4 which is why I am not assuming those who made G4 as good as it was will produce something so inferior until I see the results. I like it such G5 being even a fraction as good will come out ahead. But I won't be blind to that other works have surpassed G4 showing it had room for improvement and a reboot per the reasons I explained would the best way to improve unless I hear specific ways otherwise.


 
I find it interesting a fan of G4 would doubt the abilities of those who made you a fan, who one would expect they'd think highly of, to doubt their ability to create another good work. Nor give actual examples of how the writing of G4 they speak highly of could fix things better than a reboot.
No reason given
Edited by Incursor
Incursor

"@Hollowfox Jaeger":/images/2291333#comment_8856232
1. The G5 movie isn't live action, which is what you seem to be implying by comparing it to those.

2. Just because it's not G4 doesn't mean it will be bad. Good reboots exist. G5 could have everything that made G5 good and use the lessons from there to improve upon it. G4 surprised us with it's quality and we've seen nothing of G5 to suggest it will do what you are accusing it of.

3. The reason for the writing shortcomings in The Movie was due to: 1. being written midway thought the series meant it lacked much of the continuity and character development that made the series good. 2. It was confined to the limitations and cliches of the series and genre without what made the series successful despite that. A reboot would would fix that by being freed of those issues.

Good writing doesn't magically happen, if you're certain a sequel can fix it please give specific examples as to how. When fans complained about easy redemptions, Cozy's non-redemption caused complains as unfair given said prior redemptions. That's an example of how the baggage of G4 held it back from improving like you say a sequel would.

34. I do like G4 which is why I am not assuming those who made G4 as good as it was will produce something so inferior until I see the results. I like it such G5 being even a fraction as good will come out ahead. But I won't be blind to that other works have surpassed G4 showing it had room for improvement and a reboot per the reasons I explained would the best way to improve unless I hear specific ways otherwise.

I find it interesting a fan of G4 would doubt the abilities of those who made you a fan, who one would expect they'd think highly of, to doubt their ability to create another good work. Nor give actual examples of how the writing of G4 they speak highly of could fix things better than a reboot.
No reason given
Edited by Incursor