Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Frustration in Excelsis on image #2239274

"[@WyrmSpawN":](/images/2239274#comment_8726743
)  
Ooh, that's interesting. It reminds me that one of the things I really like about the 1st edition _*Pathfinder_* bestiaries is that they include unique group names for their monsters when listing the numbers they're likely to be found in -- a tangle of cave fishers, a flight of chimeras, a clutch of chokers, an inquisition of bone devils, a court of contract devils, a wing of gargoyles, a grove of treants, a knot of fey creatures, a rout of flail snails, a beaching of globsters... a pity the 2nd edition bestiaries don't seem to be doing this anymore.


 
I also recall "[a story":](http://wanderers-library.wikidot.com/hunting-the-margrawn) where a group of wyverns is referred to as a calamity.


 
Personally, I like "a choir of angels", "a haunting of ghosts" and a "a conflagration of dragons".
 
[@yelling_into_the_void](/images/2239274#comment_8726942)  
I think I may have busted my diaphragm.