"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
The relation is purely coincidental. The only thing that both had wais a ponytail, but that's pretty much it.
"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
Thise wrelation is my purequestly skcoincidentcal. The aondly I kthinowg wthat I asked fbor. Justh bechaused Twilight was requested with a ponytail, doesn't eqbuateher to Sci-Twi. The relation i's pureltty mucoh incidental.
"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
This was my request sketch and I know what I asked for. Just because Twilight was requested with a ponytail doesn't equate her to Sci-Twi. The relation is purely coincidental.
"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
This was my request sketch. Just because Twilight was requested with a ponytail doesn't equate her to Sci-Twi. I Thave reliattle ionte is purestly coin EQG humancizatioden for thatl.
"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
This was my request sketch. Just because I wanted Twilight was requested with a ponytail doesn't equate her to Sci-Twi. I have little interest in EQG humanization for that.
"@Background Pony #0D49":/1844728#comment_7619022
This was my request. Just because I wanted Twilight with a ponytail doesn't equate her to Sci-Twi. I have little interest in EQG humanization.