Ciaran 
Senior Moderator
友情は魔法だ
[@Background Pony \#6312](/forums/meta/topics/new-ai-policy?post_id=5453195#post_5453195)
> For reference - to try and keep information consistent - this was the kind of case I was asking about earlier, where you replied that it should get both “artist:” and “ai generated” tags going by the “tag-what-is-present” philosophy:
Yeah. This is where the details start getting a little wibbly-wobbly, and it is very easy to over think it.
In the case of >>2947191 the screenshot of the `ai generated` inspiration is a background element and informative of the process, but is not actually a part of the final image. The `ai generated` component could be completely removed and put in the description instead, and the image still stands as it is as a uniquely copyrightable work of art.
This can quickly become conflated with examples where some famous fan artist's image is pasted into the frame of a painting on a wall of a room in an image. Should that famous artist be credited? Yes.
Maybe your suggestion of a unique tag for these kinds of things really would be helpful. But right now I have absolutely no idea how to word it, how to describe its use to others, or how to moderate images with that tag.
Do you have a suggestion for what the tag should be called and its description?
My apologies if you already provided one - I'm late for a meeting right now and can't look it up. If you have something already, please reply with it.
> Philomena currently is hardcoded to add “oc” automatically
Good idea. I'll ask the dev team if they feel that would be a good idea to implement (there's a chance it already is, but is waiting for the 'go live' date to be implemented).
> For reference - to try and keep information consistent - this was the kind of case I was asking about earlier, where you replied that it should get both “artist:” and “ai generated” tags going by the “tag-what-is-present” philosophy:
Yeah. This is where the details start getting a little wibbly-wobbly, and it is very easy to over think it.
In the case of >>2947191 the screenshot of the `ai generated` inspiration is a background element and informative of the process, but is not actually a part of the final image. The `ai generated` component could be completely removed and put in the description instead, and the image still stands as it is as a uniquely copyrightable work of art.
This can quickly become conflated with examples where some famous fan artist's image is pasted into the frame of a painting on a wall of a room in an image. Should that famous artist be credited? Yes.
Maybe your suggestion of a unique tag for these kinds of things really would be helpful. But right now I have absolutely no idea how to word it, how to describe its use to others, or how to moderate images with that tag.
Do you have a suggestion for what the tag should be called and its description?
My apologies if you already provided one - I'm late for a meeting right now and can't look it up. If you have something already, please reply with it.
> Philomena currently is hardcoded to add “oc” automatically
Good idea. I'll ask the dev team if they feel that would be a good idea to implement (there's a chance it already is, but is waiting for the 'go live' date to be implemented).