Also, should the ultimate tags imply their respective older tag?
There are currently two tags, princess twilight 2.0 and ultimate twilight, which mean exactly the same thing. princess twilight 2.0
seems to have been created to refer to what Twilight looks like in “The Last Problem”, but is applied fairly indiscriminately to any image where Twilight has a Luna- or Celestia-like bodytype, resulting in the two tags being entirely synonymous in what they’re used for. I don’t see much of a benefit in keeping them separate.
princess twilight 2.0
implies spoiler:s09e26
, which, if it keeps getting added to pre-Season 9 pictures that have nothing to do with that episode, is kind of an issue.
princess twilight 2.0
currently has far more hits, but ultimate twilight has seniority and harmonizes better with ultimate chrysalis, ultimate luna and ultimate cadance. If we’re using a family of tags with closely related meanings, it would make sense to use a shared template for them.
So. What do?
princess twilight 2.0
refer specifically to images of Celestia-like Twilight linked to “The Last Problem” and ultimate twilight
to all others, and ideally make that clear in their descriptions. Alternatively, perhaps princess twilight 2.0
could serve as a subset of and imply ultimate twilight
under the same definition.Also, should the ultimate tags imply their respective older tag?
princess twilight 2.0
definitely should, and ultimate twilight
probably should also.Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!