General Tag Discussion

Because “Nightshade” was added by a mod for pics with “cold wisp”/“oc:cold wisp”, apparently, the Nightshade look-alike is supposed to be called “Cold Wisp” from this url:
 
https://inkbunny.net/submissionsviewall.php?rid=1b2dd380ec&mode=search&page=1&orderby=&text=&stringtype=&keywords=no&title=no&description=no&artist=&favsby=&type=&sale=&days=&keyword_id=112669&user_id=&random=&md5=
 
In case anyone asks why Nightshade is being removed for pics like >>1120637

@Background Pony #A8E1  
It’s not an OC. It’s the leader of the Shadowbolts.  
The artist said themselves they didn’t know what her name was so they just called her “Cold Wisp”.  

 
Since the characters name is Nightshade, that’s the tag that applies.

now posting it where it belongs
 
I wish Songbird Serenade tag implied “hair over eyes”
 
would be easier to search pics when this isn’t the case

@Zeb  
Oh. Sorry about that.

@Zeb  
And, a little more explanation from the artist themselves:
 
“Hard to say at this point. She was my interpretation of the Shadowbolts Captain, as seen in episode 2, but naturally at this point she’s quite well-developed on my end. Kind of how people take a background character and dump all this character development on them and in doing so kind of make them their character too. But yeah, that’s basically where I’m going with it.
 
Also, at the time there was no other fanon name at all predominant, so I picked one out for her. I like it quite a bit more than the names that have risen to prominence since, and whenever somepony tags a picture of her without OC tags (the Shadowbolts Captain is canon, after all) I admit I feel a little happy about that! :3”

Does this really count as scenery porn?
 

 
There doesn’t seem to be much scenery for there to be metaphorical porn of, is my issue. My understanding was that the scenery porn tag was specifically for pictures that put most or at least a large part of their focus on complex, lushly detailed or otherwise very beautiful backgrounds and, again, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of background here.

>>14381p (merged)
 
Taged “implied cannibalism” but I don’t see the “implied cannibalism” anywhere.

@warc9  
Can-apple seems to be a pun on apple & cannibal.

@FrustrationInExcelsis  
Yeah, I would agree that a detailed background != scenery porn, since the scenery itself isn’t the focus of the picture.

@warc9  
It’s because of >>830755.

@Ponylooker  
@OneOverTwo  
Fair enough.

I have realized after reporting a re-upload of a commission of mine 1610835 > 1503710 that the artist end up with 2 different artist tags, plain “silva” as in commishes and “silva-zero” as in DA, thought about mentioning it here so whoever’s more knowledge than me on the matter can consolidate both tags as one.

@Princess Trixie vi Equestria  
Usually, alias requests are best put in their own, new thread - see here for an example.

Is this really suggestive?
 
>>1090345
 
I was looking for an image that someone had has their profile picture and I looked through their favs and it didn’t pop up and I was like “surely it’s not suggestive unless it’s part of a comic or has suggestive text or something” but then sure enough I turn off my filters and it pops up and it’s pretty much the same image just with text that just says happy hearts and hooves day
 
 
Sigh it just annoys me looking for an image and then finding out that all I had to do was fucking turn my filters off because it was fucking suggestive for some fucking reason
 

 

 
I’m sorry… I’m tired and… I need to go to bed

@Rainboom Dash  
Didn’t “bedroom eyes” used to imply suggestive?
 
Btw can someone explain what kitchen eyes is supposed to be?

@saby  
Like Bedroom Eyes, but for vore purposes.

What kind of tag is that O.o

@LightningBolt  
Makes sense to me. I see this expression all the time in pre-vore, and considering there’s 380 images in the tag compared to “hungry eyes,” which isn’t even a tag on account of its 0 images, I’m gonna say this tag is certifiably a Thing™.

@WingbeatPony  
A thing I never heard of before.

@LightningBolt  
themoreyouknow.jpg
 
When you know what it is, it can be pretty obvious.
 
If you want a good and safe example to use for a tag definition:  

Well, regardless of whether the image is safe or suggestive, I’m going to say it’s okay to be used as a profile image as I’ve seen lots of profile images that are tagged suggestive
 
Well, a few… At least

Are there any hard rules for how the monster tag is used?

@evan555alpha  
@Keith Mowz  
Is the tag like, it’s own thing, or should any implications be drawn between the lidded/bedroom eyes tags?

@Dragonpone  
Not really. Generally they tend to be lidded but really it’s just any hungry look directed at the viewer or another character.

@Rainboom Dash  
it just annoys me looking for an image and then finding out that all I had to do was fucking turn my filters off  
I’ve also driven myself nuts(er) trying to track down specific images the same way without realizing that either a tag had been added after the last time I’d seen it or I’d added a tag to my Hidden list without realizing the image had that tag. _; Usually If I can’t find something I know used to exist on the first pass, I’ll check the artist (if I know it) on the DNP, then try again with the Everything filter.