General Tag Discussion

@BackgroundLoL  
“Spicy Shadow” makes me think of Edgy the Hedgy with a mustache, for some reason.

@Meanlucario  
I never said no~  
I just don’t know what the name would be. Sorry.
 
If you feel it’s needed and the tag has a clear purpose, it shouldn’t be a problem unless it’s placed on a ton of pics without asking.

@Zeb  
I’m asking because I saw an image of Twilight inflated into a large Jack-o-Lantern, and thought that there should be something to block those types of images.

@Deserter  
Now I cannot unforget it XD

@Meanlucario  
Well, maybe anything with that should be tagged with “plant tf” and “pumpkin”. If there’s any more images like that, I’ll gladly tag them as such, and you can add them to your complex filter.

Should this be explicit or questionable? I can’t tell exactly what is going on…
 
>>1456601
 
Oh, there’s a story included… duh
 
Okay… but there’s nothing directly showing… and the intent isn’t FULLY clear
 
Eh, maybe…
 
Idk
 
Probably explicit…

Is this a nipple peek?  

shiningbetes 》》》shining adorable

stuffed should imply inflation
 
@Binkyt11  
please use relative links, people use a bunch of different urls to the site to sign in

i hope this is the last time i need to say it, but  
dazzleblaze needs to be aliased to adaria

Why do we need a spoiler tag for the movie adaptation? Shouldn’t the adaptation just be implied by spoiler:my little pony movie?

@Blissful690  
The adaption came out about a month or so before the movie. We added a spoiler tag for it because it spoiled the whole movie.

 
Would this count as anthro or like… what? I intended a more anthro version of her, but she still has the spider butt. Is there any tag I should use for this if it isn’t anthro?

@Binkyt11  
probably anthro, found four similar images  
>>1504799 >>657883 (deleted) >>758186 >>1026372

@Binkyt11  
I would say Centaur, seeing she is a spider version of one, ie Drider.

@BackgroundLoL
 
StSyaN  
Thank you!

Would this be simple background?
 
>>1568498
 
It doesn’t match the definition of ‘simple background’ but… the background looks pretty simple to me… but it does have multiple colors which..
 
idk

@Rainboom Dash  
Looks white enough for me.  
Also, wasn’t there a tag for graduated background?

@Mad Black  
Well, it says “don’t use with gradient backgrounds or backgrounds with more than one color”
 
soooooo
 
Technically speaking, it wouldn’t be a ‘simple background’

Suggestive or Questionable?  

@Meanlucario  
i’d say questionable

@Rainboom Dash  
Technically speaking, it wouldn’t be a ’simple background’  
First time I’d noticed that gradient background doesn’t imply simple background.

Is explicit comments even needed given rule 7?

@Background Pony #A8E1  
I’m not 100% sure, since it was years before I even used the site.
 
But I remember being told there was a time in the early days that ratings tags weren’t required on images. Or at least a time when the Safe tag didn’t even exist.
 
That and I’m not sure how strict rule 7 [or whatever rule # it was back then] was enforced. As well as a few times that the comments were so full of explicit roleplay on safe pics [number in the hundreds of comments] that it would be far too much work to try and clean them all, so an explicit comments tag was put on images. And sometimes the image rated explicit as well even though it was safe.
 
Thankfully, my lack of a life has allowed me to go through such images once in a while and do cleanup~  
Just look at all these deleted comments:  
>>106617  
>>105130
 
Anywho. I’ll take a look at a couple more images now that it’s been brought to my attention again.  
Just finished this one:  
>>121272

Should the artist:magnalunansfw artist tag stay? It has a history of being removed from images and added to new ones.